2506
Just sayin (mander.xyz)
submitted 11 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 15 points 11 months ago

You're not wrong but surely you don't mean to say that mankind should never have discovered agriculture, right? At that point we may as well say that gaining sentience fucked everything up because it was the beginning of wilfully hurting others despite having the capacity for empathy (aka doing evil things).

[-] alex@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

but surely you don't mean to say that mankind should never have discovered agriculture, right?

RETURN TO MONKE

[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

No I'm serious, and I understand you mean well but I can't have this discussion meaningfully with you without writing 8 paragraphs of context.

There's a lot of what Pratchett called 'lies to children' when it comes to non-university anthropology, things we learned in school that were kind of outdated already and gross oversimplifications.

We were told that agriculture allowed the free time to specialize and was the beginning of culture but the truth is that all that hunter-gatherer man needed to hunt to feed himself and 3 other people was about 6 hours of actual work a week. And specialization already existed with stone knapping and pottery.

There's a lot more to it but I don't really have the patience to keep writing this.

[-] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

Well, you did a good job condensing where you were coming from in two paragraphs. Enough to make me realise that I mistook your original meaning completely. I hadn't heard the 6 hours of work a week number before. In fact, I've never really questioned the logic I was taught with regards to agriculture being the start of civilisation due to freeing up hands and allowing people to settle down, because hunter gatherers would have to roam around at least a little to follow herds or seasonal effects on available forage. That understanding was based on what I've learned in history 101 at high school though.

I started out a bit argumentative because I read your comment as an overly dramatic lamentation that I took to mean something like: "people are so bad I wish we weren't born/evolved". Thanks for taking the time to kindly explain. I'm always interested in having a possible blind spot or internalised assumption revealed and to reassess entrenched beliefs.

[-] Zoop@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Their previous comment read the same way to me, too; just so you know it's not only you that thought that's what they meant.

Sometimes when I misinterpret something, I wonder if I'm the only one, or if others would've interpreted it similarly, so I can take that information and have a better idea of how to move forward and learn from the situation. So, I dunno, just thought I'd say something just in case you're similar ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

One other thing to point out is that agriculture allowed for large mobile armies.

For hunter gatherers it wasn't easy to stockpile enough long term storage portable food to take to war, nor could you predict periods of bounty (which is why so many ancient cultures had prohibitions to making war during winter that almost no one broke) to plan long term campaigns. This style of sustenance also kept nomadic band population low as following the herds and the reduction of ease of hunting and complications in moving gave significant advantage to smaller social units.

We see a radical increase in social group size with the advent of agriculture, eventually leading to more permanent town and eventually city living instead of nomadic bands as you generally needed to be in one place to keep others from taking your crops and tending them year round.

I fully understand that there are a lot of luxuries and even just basic life improvements that wouldn't be available to us if we had kept as small hunter gatherer bands, and maybe a lot of people alive now couldn't survive or thrive in that kind of environment, it would be a very, very different world than what we know today but one thing I do know is that of we had never discovered agriculture we would never have eventually become a species that could kill off 95% of the life on the planet with the press of a button.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
2506 points (97.8% liked)

Memes

45875 readers
1069 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS