233
Should programming.dev defederate from Meta if they implement ActivityPub? (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by starman@programming.dev to c/meta@programming.dev
155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm not suggesting anything, just want to know what do you think.

Here is a link if someone don't know what Meta's Threads is: https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2023/07/what-to-know-about-threads/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] o_o@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've read that XMPP article before, but it doesn't convince me.

Yes, Meta may "kill" the fediverse. That's a risk. But either we take that risk, or we "kill" the fediverse ourselves by defederating. That's my opinion.

EDIT: Besides, defederating just hands them more users. Wouldn't you rather keep the users, and allow them to see Meta content? Maybe even attract some Meta users here by inviting them? The launch of a Meta competitor is what's causing the risk to the fediverse. Federating with them is how we can mitigate that risk.

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I read your edit, you make very good points there and here. We really should leave the power in the hands of users/sub/community mods to decide what they want, rather than instance owners acting like sub mods and making blanket decisions for all their users. That's the reddit model.

I assume filtering requirements requires changes to the Lemmy code base, which if they don't already exist is surprising.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
233 points (99.6% liked)

Programming.dev Meta

2365 readers
29 users here now

Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!

This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.

Links

Credits

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev