860
submitted 11 months ago by lledrtx@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderBoob@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

Take a look at New Zealand's approach to this issue. We have much stronger laws for our people and we have a thriving economy regardless.

Companies nees to really think about hiring staff as the process for firing in and of itself, let along laying someone off is a difficult and costly one.

This results in two main things; 1, when a company changes direction or a project gets cancelled - they try as hard as they can (and have the legal obligation to) to place you on a different project but you keep your role. 2, if that is not possible, they need to help and support you when it comes to either finding a new and different role within the company, or find a role elsewhere, by providing interview training or help with your CV.

This does not apply for contractors, who get treated more like employees do in America and are a way for companies to avoid the risk of over recruitment, at the expense of having to pay someone twice the market rate.

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
860 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

10134 readers
117 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS