10
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kd637_mi 20 points 1 year ago

If it has to be build to rent, I would rather the housing be publicly owned. I'm not really a fan of media spruiking how good corporate dominance over more of our lives is.

For all the shit people give commie blocks, I would much rather a stable commie block to live in that I know I won't have to move from than the constant anxiety of whether I will have to find a new home for my family.

[-] quicken@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I would rather the housing be publicly owned

I agree. Everyone seems to ignore there's no motivation for investors to make homes for the poor. They're all fighting over the "higher margin" investments.

[-] w2qw@aussie.zone -2 points 1 year ago

I think the advantage of doing it privately is that some company is footing the bill if there's structural issues and that the government doesn't need to issue more debt.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1297 readers
37 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS