this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
173 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8396 readers
383 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is that a problem?
Is labor aristocracy being in charge of organizations whose aim is to advocate for working class people a problem? I sure think people making six figures are likely to be disconnected from working people who actually struggle, so yes.
Hmm, I may have personal bias there but I don't think that earning a high salary excludes someone from having empathy for working people's struggle.
It doesn't exclude you but it certainly suggests someone else with direct knowledge and experience should be in charge. Their material conditions put completely different pressures on them than they do poorer comrades.
I don't necessarily disagree. I just think the thought process isn't good. Good people come from all places and we shouldn't restrict people from leadership positions based on income or wealth. Restrict them if they act in a way that limits the movement.
I will forever be suspect of any org with finance vampires anywhere near the levers of power. I'm a materialist, not an idealist.