331
submitted 6 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Stop wearing Vision Pro goggles while driving your Tesla: U.S. transportation officials, Calif. police::Videos, many of them stunts or jokes, of people wearing Apple’s new virtual reality headset while driving Teslas in Autopilot mode prompted officials to issue warnings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

it's basically just hololens right?
also visionos is not the first "spatial os", windows 10 was the first. (ever notice how stuff has circular glow effect around it? it's supposed to show up around the pointer while using the os in vr/ar)
Microsoft quickly abandoned the idea tho as well as basically the whole uwp platform (which was supposed to bring the same apps on pc, windows mobile, xbox and hololens)

[-] G0ldenSp00n@lemmy.jacaranda.club 8 points 6 months ago

It's camera pass-through, so while it is the same idea as hololens (overlaying windows on reality). The hololens would actually be a safer thing to wear while driving, given it fully transparent. There are not screens blocking your vision with camera feeds overlayed on top.

[-] vvv@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

Very important distinction. When the apple vr battery dies, or the software fails, you're suddenly blind.

[-] excitingburp@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Hololens is slightly more advanced. At least the last I saw it uses waveguides etc. to overlay the content over a transparent panel. Much like Google glasses, but way, way more advanced (and therefore justifiably expensive - last I saw, again, it was something like $15000). AVP is no different to a $300 Quest (plus internal cameras for iris and expression tracking and obnoxiously bad FOV) - it's 10x Apple tax.

Hololens is still alive and kicking btw, but it's exclusively enterprise.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

HoloLens 2 was supposed to cost 3500$

also iirc there were cheaper hololens-compatible headsets made by third parties at the time (not anymore) marketed towards consumers

[-] VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Microsoft should have stuck with HoloLens

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
331 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

57226 readers
3882 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS