753
The invention (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Yes it is. He went and paid for a licensed image for which he did not have the rights, with the intention of displaying it to society.

That's the epitome of commodification.

The idea that tattoos are personal and therefore don't count as commodities is bogus. Personal effects are still very much commodities.

If Watterson didn't want Calvin and Hobbes on a t shirt or a coffee mug, why would you think he wants it on a tattoo?

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Because a tattoo is created by a tattoo artist, a skilled worker who is paid (relatively) well. A tattoo is unique and cannot be duplicated or resold.

A T-shirt and coffee mug are manufactured in a sweatshop by a multinational corporation, and have no inherent value beyond the value of the IP itself.

It's the difference between having a personal appreciation for Watterson's comics, and exploiting their value to sell useless junk. Do you honestly think Watterson would be upset about a long time fan getting a tattoo of Calvin? I highly doubt it.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
753 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12666 readers
2719 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS