753
The invention (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by lawrence@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 134 points 8 months ago

You know what I love most about Bill Watterson, even more than his absolute genius at comics and amazing insight? The fact that he was never interested on making a bajillion dollars through merchandising. He was regularly offered to have companies make everything from plush Hobbes toys to Saturday morning cartoons and he turned them all down. He could have been as rich as Jim Davis (net worth $5.8 billion) but he cared about Calvin and Hobbes too much. And then, one day, he decided he didn't want to do it anymore before it got stale. So he quit.

So much respect for that guy.

Incidentally, a book just came out that he did the illustrations for. I haven't read it myself.

https://publishing.andrewsmcmeel.com/book/the-mysteries/

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 36 points 8 months ago

You’re right; he wasn’t greedy, so Calvin and Hobbes stayed pure. That’s why it never got yucky. Glad to know about the new book. Thanks for the head’s up!

[-] boyi 25 points 8 months ago

Jim Davis (net worth $5.8 billion)

Where did you get this figure? I can only find sources with figure about $800 million.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

Ah! Sorry! I looked up the wrong Jim Davis. Apparently there is also a really rich Jim Davis who runs New Balance footwear.

Still, $800 million is filthy rich.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 12 points 8 months ago

There's also a Jim Davis who's a professional MTG player and content creator. I'm sure he's no billionaire though.

[-] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

Why are there so many Jim Davi? Did someone leave the factory running?

[-] moody@lemmings.world 12 points 8 months ago

I think the correct plural is Jim Davises or Jims Davis. I think Jim Daves may also be acceptable.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Jim Davi.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I mean...have we ever seen them all in one place at the same time?

[-] boyi 8 points 8 months ago

no prob. that explains it.

[-] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago

offered to have companies make everything from plush Hobbes toys

Admit it though, we all would have wanted a Hobbes plushy.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

All the more reason I respect him. He cared how he wanted his characters to be used even at the expense of what who knows how many other people wanted.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Also it would have defeated the purpose of the story. Hobbes was a generic tiger doll, not anything magical or secret in itself. The point was that Calvin's wild imagination brought Hobbes and everything else in his fantasies to vivid life, and selling an "official" Hobbes doll would have flown in the face of that. The heart and soul of Watterson's story suggests that any kid could have their own Hobbes-style adventures with any toy they happened to have and love and give life, not that they needed their parents to buy them the "real" Hobbes.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

I think of this every time I see a pickup with a window decal of Calvin peeing on the opposing truck Brand's logo. They are so common and all unauthorized usage! Also it's way more childish than Calvin would ever do.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Calving praying is worse.

[-] some_guy 4 points 8 months ago

This is why I proudly have Stupendous Man tattooed on my body. The comic had such a profound role in my childhood. It's an honor to have such a special character on my skin, along with other important reminders of who I am as a person. Watterson is a hero for expanding the meaning of imagination.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

I feel like that's the kind of commodification Watterson would have frowned upon.

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

A tattoo is not an example of commodification at all. It's a piece of artwork, not a mass-produced plushie toy.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Yes it is. He went and paid for a licensed image for which he did not have the rights, with the intention of displaying it to society.

That's the epitome of commodification.

The idea that tattoos are personal and therefore don't count as commodities is bogus. Personal effects are still very much commodities.

If Watterson didn't want Calvin and Hobbes on a t shirt or a coffee mug, why would you think he wants it on a tattoo?

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Because a tattoo is created by a tattoo artist, a skilled worker who is paid (relatively) well. A tattoo is unique and cannot be duplicated or resold.

A T-shirt and coffee mug are manufactured in a sweatshop by a multinational corporation, and have no inherent value beyond the value of the IP itself.

It's the difference between having a personal appreciation for Watterson's comics, and exploiting their value to sell useless junk. Do you honestly think Watterson would be upset about a long time fan getting a tattoo of Calvin? I highly doubt it.

[-] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 3 points 8 months ago

What about the millions of American cars that have pissing Calvin bumper stickers

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Did Bill Watterson coin the term “simp”?

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

In this context I believe it was short for simpleton.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Which is an old use of "simp," far predating the modern online slang. "Simp" short for "simpleton" was being thrown around school playgrounds in the early 1980s to my knowledge, maybe earlier than that.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

Isn't that the modern meaning of it as well? You'd have to be a simpleton to donate money to a titty streamer.

[-] Aggravationstation@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I've heard that it stands for "Sadly Idolising Mediocre Pussy" but that could be something that was coined after it started being used to describe internet simps.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

There's no way lol.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Behold Ronald, in his only named appearance!

[-] aeki@slrpnk.net 11 points 8 months ago

Ohh those pencil sharpeners on the wall, such nostalgia.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 8 months ago

Do they not have those anymore? 👴

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I haven't been in school for 10 years now and they were being replaced by electric sharpeners even then

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

My high school had them in every room at least until last year when I graduated. And they weren't like old leftover ones or anything, the building is only about 12 years old

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I mean, they worked, they weren't difficult to use and you didn't have to worry about batteries, electrical hookups, fried motors, etc. As long as you're still using pencils, why not use hand-cranked pencil sharpeners?

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, an electric pencil sharpener seems like a huge waste of money

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 8 months ago

They're about the same price.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 8 months ago

Maybe at time of purchase. I can almost guarantee the old school one will last longer and cost less over its lifetime.

[-] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

That's funny

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
753 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12186 readers
2304 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lawrence@lemmy.world