753
The invention (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 134 points 9 months ago

You know what I love most about Bill Watterson, even more than his absolute genius at comics and amazing insight? The fact that he was never interested on making a bajillion dollars through merchandising. He was regularly offered to have companies make everything from plush Hobbes toys to Saturday morning cartoons and he turned them all down. He could have been as rich as Jim Davis (net worth $5.8 billion) but he cared about Calvin and Hobbes too much. And then, one day, he decided he didn't want to do it anymore before it got stale. So he quit.

So much respect for that guy.

Incidentally, a book just came out that he did the illustrations for. I haven't read it myself.

https://publishing.andrewsmcmeel.com/book/the-mysteries/

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 36 points 9 months ago

You’re right; he wasn’t greedy, so Calvin and Hobbes stayed pure. That’s why it never got yucky. Glad to know about the new book. Thanks for the head’s up!

[-] boyi 25 points 9 months ago

Jim Davis (net worth $5.8 billion)

Where did you get this figure? I can only find sources with figure about $800 million.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago

Ah! Sorry! I looked up the wrong Jim Davis. Apparently there is also a really rich Jim Davis who runs New Balance footwear.

Still, $800 million is filthy rich.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 12 points 9 months ago

There's also a Jim Davis who's a professional MTG player and content creator. I'm sure he's no billionaire though.

[-] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

Why are there so many Jim Davi? Did someone leave the factory running?

[-] moody@lemmings.world 12 points 9 months ago

I think the correct plural is Jim Davises or Jims Davis. I think Jim Daves may also be acceptable.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I mean...have we ever seen them all in one place at the same time?

[-] boyi 8 points 9 months ago

no prob. that explains it.

[-] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 months ago

offered to have companies make everything from plush Hobbes toys

Admit it though, we all would have wanted a Hobbes plushy.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

All the more reason I respect him. He cared how he wanted his characters to be used even at the expense of what who knows how many other people wanted.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Also it would have defeated the purpose of the story. Hobbes was a generic tiger doll, not anything magical or secret in itself. The point was that Calvin's wild imagination brought Hobbes and everything else in his fantasies to vivid life, and selling an "official" Hobbes doll would have flown in the face of that. The heart and soul of Watterson's story suggests that any kid could have their own Hobbes-style adventures with any toy they happened to have and love and give life, not that they needed their parents to buy them the "real" Hobbes.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

I think of this every time I see a pickup with a window decal of Calvin peeing on the opposing truck Brand's logo. They are so common and all unauthorized usage! Also it's way more childish than Calvin would ever do.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Calving praying is worse.

[-] some_guy 4 points 9 months ago

This is why I proudly have Stupendous Man tattooed on my body. The comic had such a profound role in my childhood. It's an honor to have such a special character on my skin, along with other important reminders of who I am as a person. Watterson is a hero for expanding the meaning of imagination.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

I feel like that's the kind of commodification Watterson would have frowned upon.

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

A tattoo is not an example of commodification at all. It's a piece of artwork, not a mass-produced plushie toy.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Yes it is. He went and paid for a licensed image for which he did not have the rights, with the intention of displaying it to society.

That's the epitome of commodification.

The idea that tattoos are personal and therefore don't count as commodities is bogus. Personal effects are still very much commodities.

If Watterson didn't want Calvin and Hobbes on a t shirt or a coffee mug, why would you think he wants it on a tattoo?

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Because a tattoo is created by a tattoo artist, a skilled worker who is paid (relatively) well. A tattoo is unique and cannot be duplicated or resold.

A T-shirt and coffee mug are manufactured in a sweatshop by a multinational corporation, and have no inherent value beyond the value of the IP itself.

It's the difference between having a personal appreciation for Watterson's comics, and exploiting their value to sell useless junk. Do you honestly think Watterson would be upset about a long time fan getting a tattoo of Calvin? I highly doubt it.

[-] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 3 points 9 months ago

What about the millions of American cars that have pissing Calvin bumper stickers

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
753 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12666 readers
2229 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS