750
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] n3m37h@lemmy.world 212 points 9 months ago

Let's ban a product instead of solving the issue at hand... Seriously? I hate my country more and more as each day passes

[-] sab@kbin.social 24 points 9 months ago

While this is seems a bit incompetent, it is easier for them to make technology less available than to fix the underlying issues here. They might set out to do both, but solving the underlying issues will take more time.

At least they're trying to do the right thing, and they're making an effort to deal with a problem that affects real people. Good on them.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 102 points 9 months ago

This is like banning usb cables so Hyundai/Kia cars won’t be stolen, instead of forcing the car manufacturer to just install an actual immobilizer on affected vehicles. Seeing Hyundai/Kia do everything but install immobilizers is infuriating as well. They’re rolling out software updates, giving out wheel locks, installing cages on the ignition panel, etc. Literally everything but fix the problem.

[-] seang96@spgrn.com 31 points 9 months ago

The problem is they are banning a device that doesn't solve the issue at all except if you have a car from before the 90s. The tools being used for this are custom made with a much larger range. Maybe they should ban smartphones too since people are using them to detect laptops in cars to break into since they are being stupid about it.

[-] anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca 4 points 9 months ago

How do you use a phone to detect a laptop in a car? If it’s on, sure I get it but if the laptop is asleep or off I can’t see how a phone will detect it?

[-] seang96@spgrn.com 20 points 9 months ago

Article said they were using Bluetooth and a app on play store / app store I assume the app measures the signal strength to determine the proximity to the devices. Maybe some laptops don't turn off Bluetooth in their sleep state or people just weren't putting their laptops to sleep? Could pickup tablets or phones forgotten in cars too.

[-] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As he said, that only works if the device is on, which would be really odd in a car. I'm not aware of any that keep comms on in sleep, since those are typically high power draw.

[-] seang96@spgrn.com 7 points 9 months ago
[-] fuzetsu@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Most MacBooks keep Bluetooth on when in sleep mode. There isn’t even a setting to stop it, the only option is to manually turn Bluetooth off before closing the lid or to use 3rd party software to automate turning it off.

[-] n3m37h@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

It won't stop theives from being able to obtain them. And it's a legit tool, should we ban all usb because they can be used to steal Hyundai and Kia cars?

It's obvious there are flaws to car manufacturers theft protection. Shit watch LPL, lock noob, Bosnian Bill (hope you're doing well brother) and you will see most locks are a fucking joke.

There are Defcon vids on YouTube that go over how cars can be hacked yet manufacturers are still using these systems

[-] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This device is probably not what a professional car thief would use. It may be used sometimes by someone messing around, but it's a tool made for an introduction into different types of penetration (testing). It doesn't do anything as well as a more dedicated device would, and it's also not as customizable. If a car is vulnerable to this then it's vulnerable to a lot more things. Also, if someone really wants to steal your car they don't need this device specifically.

[-] n3m37h@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

More like hide the problem so no one knows about it. This is the entire locksmith ideology, security through obscurity and that has been working out great hasn't it?

I don't have any faith in our incompetent government to do anything right if it costs corporations money.

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 2 points 9 months ago

I figure half the purpose of these sorts of devices is to prove just how insecure certain systems are to bring about change. Governments rarely have a good grasp on this sort of thing though. It's not like banning the device will make anyone more secure.

[-] VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

What does blackface Trudeau have to say on the matter I wonder.

[-] n3m37h@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Who gives a shit? He prob doesn't know what it is or what it is used for either, and neither does his party apparently

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
750 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59710 readers
2005 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS