744
submitted 6 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Journalist says he finds it ‘surreal’ to have account on X suspended after writing critique of platform::The author’s account had over 100,000 followers and was around 14 years old, he said

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 80 points 6 months ago

Social networks that do this should lose any safe harbor provisions. Government are so fucking far behind with basic common sense.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Absolutely. You cannot claim safe harbor while banning stuff like this.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

i hate banning anyone as much as the next anarcho-dingus but afaik there's no law against banning whoever you want and i'm not sure there should be one. i don't know what the answer is, if it isn't public control of all social media.

maybe some public funded internet services such as defederated twitter and reddit alternatives? completely open and paid for with taxes, in direct competition with their for-profit contemporaries.

[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

Like the BBC mastadon instance social.bbc

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
744 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

57175 readers
3843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS