42
submitted 1 year ago by makeitra1n@lemm.ee to c/formula1@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Aceofspades@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for quoting the article.

I was wondering why McLaren stuck with the hards but that reasoning makes sense. Still not sure why they went with the hards in the first place though. The race was well over half finished and they could have completed it on softs. In the end I don't think it changed anything but curious nonetheless.

[-] deepthot 4 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing one reason was that they had new hards available, but only scrub softs.

[-] unomar@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they were concerned about their deg with softs since Silverstone is typically a high deg track. Maybe they didn't do any long runs in FP and didn't have the data to show that they could last 20+ laps.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

5557 readers
1 users here now

c/formula1

Welcome to c/formula1.

Rules

Please keep discussions civil, respect other's opinions, and keep it friendly. Please read our rules before posting in our community.

Rules TLDR

Resources

These sites are a good place to start finding out about Formula 1, aside from right here of course!

Formula1.com - the official Formula 1 website.
Formula 1 Youtube - the official F1 youtube channel.
Liquipedia Overview - what's happening now and next in a nice dashboard.
F1Calendar.com - never miss a session again!
F1Countdown.com - for those of you who like countdowns!

Sister Communities

!Motorsports - for the love of racing outside of Formula 1.
!FormulaDank@Lemmy.world - because you love memes.
!simracing@lemmy.ml - let's race!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS