this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8441 readers
247 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I have heard people sometimes say the reason for no aliens is that complex life requires so many coincidences it is just incredibly unlikely to indecently arise anywhere else in the universe. I think it is a bit arrogant to assume all life has to mimic life found here on Earth, so forgetting the goldilocks zone for a minute, you still need life to emerge from nothing over the course of billions of years. Then you need complex life to emerge from that, and eventually civilization. But you know what else you need?

Extinction.

No extinction means no fossil fuels means no industrial revolution means no spacefaring. If it wasn't for the dinosaurs, we would have nothing. Makes you wonder what we're here for.

I conclude that any advanced alien lifeform that gets to this stage will have to use a source of power not used so much on Earth. Hydro and Thermal seem unlikely, it's less portable and requires huge facilities, so it will probably have to something else. I imagine rivers of liquid gas, a space-faring civilization built upon lakes made up entirely of methane.

Edit:

It has been brought to my attention that fossil fuels are not in fact made up of ancient dead dinosaurs, and even if they were, we wouldn't need a meteor to make this happen. I just like Dinos angry-hex

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] idkmybffjoeysteel@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

idk I feel like there is a big leap between a small water mill and the Hoover dam, and can you imagine trying to mine all the raw materials using battery power?

and how are they gonna ignite the nuke

[โ€“] Frank@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I think nuclear weapons use an array of very precisely designed high explosives to shove the elements of the core together and trigger the nuclear reaction. And yeah, fossil fuels are great as a portable high-density energy source, but there are other options; biodiesel, for instance. You're absolutely right that it would be a very, very different energy economy.