view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
More radical assholes than even Putin? I'm all about Putin's shit getting kicked in, but Navalny and folks like him are not a solution we should explore. I'm sick of people glorifying both of those assholes. Defending Navalny is like defending solving your wasp problem with rabid badgers. I don't want either in my home, and though the latter may solve the first, it's going to create some much bigger problems
Please explain why you say what you say
They fell for the Russian disinformation campaign trying to paint Navalny as a far right nationalist and proponent of the Ukraine invasion, even though he repeatedly voiced his disapproval in recent years.
RT propaganda works it seems
If that had been true, he'd have LOVED Putin ffs 🤦
it is true. he thought putin was not fascist enough.
Yeah right 🙄
In one of the videos, in which he advocates for gun rights, he compares militants from the Caucasus to cockroaches and mimics shooting one who attempts to "attack" him.
you don't need to believe me but i hope you look into it.
And killing journalist in the middle of Moscow is ok? Or another journalist and human rights activist? Or killed later Boris Nemtsov? To be fair Kadirov killed even his own bodyguard. Also mentioned gun laws are copy of ukrainian gun laws. Speaking of ukrainians: apparently in 2022 he grown tired of killing only russians and chechens, so he kills ukrainians since then too.
Speaking of cockroaches and other animals: is it now how western media calls russians now? And by extent call chechens too. So russians can't talk about domestic problems, but foreign media can talk about russians' problems?
I already can see your mental gymnastics coming.
>Speaking of ukrainians: apparently in 2022 he grown tired of killing only russians and chechens, so he kills ukrainians since then too.
you're not going to catch me saying putin does good things. i don't know if he's ever done a single good thing.
I'm talking about Kadirov
... what makes you think i had anything to say about him at all?
Because he is one of mentioned Caucasus militants
I don't call people vermin. I think the dehumanization is a pretty clear line that we shouldn't cross. I suppose I could make an exception for fascists, as I think turnabout is fair play. in this case, a nationalist calling the leader of a militant ethnic group vermin, I think that's pretty fucking gross.
>Speaking of cockroaches and other animals: is it now how western media calls russians now?
i haven't heard that, but i'd condemn it if i did.
Please don't follow me around. This is harassment.
I am not following you at all but it won't hurt my feelings if you block me.
Nah I'm just kidding.
I remember
Russian disinformation? Can you name a single policy that would have made Navalny a desirable outcome? You think he'd pull out of Ukraine?
Navalny would've been the preferable candidate in every regard. The list of reasons is literally too long to be summarized by a single comment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexei_Navalny#Foreign_policy
He also had good internal policy
Because the man is a racist, imperialist, fash piece of shit. It's an unfortunate mentality when you figure there's only two options here. There are a million better outcomes possible. Forgive me for not rooting for Pinochet to replace Pol Pot.
Please provide the proof, you’re just saying stuff, I’m asking you to support your position.
I’m curious and I’m not against you, but I can’t take what you’re saying as serious if you are only saying “feelings.”
I already can guess he will try to frame Navalny's video from 16 years ago about Basaev's militants and Kadirov's personal army as "racism towards muslims".