56
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 8 months ago

Oh it was here https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_218172.htm#:~:text=The%20background%20was%20that%20President,condition%20for%20not%20invade%20Ukraine

this bit in particular

The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second class membership. We rejected that.

So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders. He has got the exact opposite. He has got more NATO presence in eastern part of the Alliance and he has also seen that Finland has already joined the Alliance and Sweden will soon be a full member.

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Thanks, that’s exactly the one!

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
56 points (95.2% liked)

World News

2287 readers
165 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS