28
submitted 5 months ago by jackpot@lemmy.ml to c/android@lemmy.ml

google never says it's foss and it makes sense why theyd not foss it, extend and extinguish. flathub says proprietary, wikipedia says both, im very confused

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] matrixrunner@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

Android Studio is a fork of IntelliJ IDEA, which is open sourced and free software (under Apache 2.0), with additions from Google (proprietary and closed source, as far as I can tell), so it has components that are both. This is compatible with the Apache license, which doesn't require that derivative works be distributed under the same license.

So, ultimately, Android Studio has some components that are open source and some that aren't.

[-] jackpot@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

and is there no other way to make kptlin code?

[-] evo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] 0xd34d@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

There's always the command line tools with gradle ๐Ÿ˜‰

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

The regular FOSS Intellij Idea is the premier Kotlin IDE and can do Android too. Though Google is usually a slog to throw their AGP integration code over the fence which sucks because projects sometimes upgrade their AGP quite aggressively.

[-] cyrus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

The code itself is just text, an IDE just gives you fancy integration.

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
28 points (86.8% liked)

Android

8968 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss anything related to Android or Android adjacent.


INFO:


Check Out Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.world

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS