-6

Should Gyrados' type be changed to Water/Dragon? (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by maness300@lemmy.world to c/pokemon@lemmy.ml

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Gyrados, as well all know, is actually a Water/Flying type. This was done because Dragon was not a type in the game when Gyrados was introduced.

Should this be fixed on have his type changed to what he was based on? A Chinese Water Dragon?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Myr@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Isn't the Dratini line dragon type in Gen 1? The same games that Gyarados was introduced.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Yes, OP is wrong. Dragon type existed in Gen 1 and was wildly overpowered.

[-] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah and the Dratini line was the only dragon type in gen 1 and was supposed to be very powerful and psudo-legendary.

I wouldn't be surprised if they decided against giving Gyarados the dragon type because of that specific lore reason as it's never made a whole lot of sense to me that it had the flying type either. I think Gyarados would be too strong both offensively and defensively if it didn't have the quad elec weakness which is probably why it's the way it is. (Disclaimer: I know nothing of Pokemon beyond gen4 and feel free to disregard my opinions)

this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024

-6 points (25.0% liked)

Pokémon

3062 readers

1 users here now

The Lemmy community for all things Pokémon!

Rules:

1. Be a decent human being.
1. Fanart must be credited.
1. No untagged spoilers of new games, anime episodes, etc.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Metallinatus@lemmy.ml

N3DSdude@lemmy.ml