167
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 60 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't see how adding a futures market on top would make the spice less scarce. All you are doing is creating inequality. The total spice remains the same.

I think market nerds forget that markets themselves are a form of rationing.

If there are 1000 people and 1000 pieces of bread, a perfectly fair system would give one piece of bread to every person. In market system, the amount of bread remains the same except it's rationed based on purchasing power. So if bread costs $1 and 50% of the population has no money while rest have $2, then the "Rich" could buy double the bread.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 9 months ago

It's also the most inelastic resource ever since it both enables interworld trade and is highly addictive, and, off world, it is used exclusively by obscenely wealthy people. Interworld trade is also not optional for places like Giedi Prime without enough agriculture to feed the on world population.

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
167 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13565 readers
765 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS