55
submitted 1 year ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, absolutely. I think of it as more of a domino effect than butterfly. What we don't know is how many dominoes the next one to fall will touch. The actuaries at Farmers determined that N events of X size in Y timeframe make these policies undesirable, but it tells us nothing about what N+1 means to other divisions of Farmers, let alone what happens at other companies with their own Xs and Ys.

[-] lagomorphlecture@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Well, each major insurer that leaves makes the state more undesirable for everyone that's left. Each one of these insurers had their share of the "bad" business and now the ones who are left have to sift through the applicants to try to figure out who is safe to insure and who is going to cost them their ability to continue doing business. So with every insurer that leaves, those undesirable risks who pushed them out end up more and more concentrated with the other carriers. I would expect to see more and more of this.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2247 readers
64 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS