Let me tell you how excited I am that we're getting yet more slow-moving heavy rains.
I mean, Jesus fuck, does anyone believe we've not crossed the Rubicon?
U.S. citizens were released only after agreeing to delete videos and photos of the raid from their phones, the UFW added.
There's really no reason not to colocate in arid regions. Ag gets the benefits from the snippet, but an equally important panel placing is waterways. Canals, lakes ... reducing evaporation means more water, which less is than required of for ag, meaning more crops for the same amount of water or -- as is currently the problem -- keeping output steady with less water use.
Short of having to occasionally balance my batteries off mains, living off solar is amazing. I do nothing, pay nothing and just have power. The city-owned utility is addicted to raising rates without improving reliability. Each time a storm rolls through, I pity the fools posting on Reddit about a power outage.
The midpoint is "give the corporations whatever they want." One side adds internal genocide just for fun, while both are fine with that happening everywhere else.
It's clear that neoliberalism is dead. The questions are what replaces it and whether it would actually be an improvement.
Takes notes
So you're telling me I should start a business.
This is my first time running into his work. I intend to dig deeper now that I've seen how no-bullshit insightful he is.
I try my best. Thanks for the kind words.
To paraphrase ... someone ... You can't unfuck in a single graf what took three prior volumes and an additional 20 chapters in Vol. 4 to lay out. There's a lot of soul searching that needs to be done before we start moving in the right direction.
I frequently use "therewith," so I'm a terrible person to gauge such things.
Well, this is somewhat of a tedious slog to figure out what "young adults" are defined as.
From the abstract:
Ellipsis not mine. Good thing we get to a fourth significant figure on age, though.
So, we have an absurdly skewed dataset ... I'll round, because this is ... not data. Eight in 10 are women and nine in 10 have at least a bachelor's. That's going to get you results, but how they apply to the population in general is an exercise for statisticians who should know better.
If you want to say "most college-educated women," we have a starting point, though still no clear age range, which is a fatal flaw for the premise of the conclusion. It's unclear what setting up a survey under these conditions was intended to measure.