I'm removing this, as it's analysis better suited for finance. Please feel free to repost there.
One other thing I'd suggest is letting all your reactions since that period out for some air before determining the angle you're coming from for the final product. Twenty was my first annus horribilis, and as time has stretched, my memories of it and attitudes thereto have shifted over the years. But those reactions are also canon in a sense, and it can be hard to cleave out everything between experience and present day.
You only have one of those chapters? Lucky!
For me, facing such a passage can be relatively overwhelming, and it doesn't help that during such times, memory can be fragmented and disjointed, adding yet another hurdle to the process.
That said, my first question is whether the words aren't coming or something else is blocking you that you're interpreting as words because that's the end result. I'm not so much looking for you to answer that question here, but rather to spend some time for yourself determining whether you've correctly ascertained the root cause(s). More than once, I've gotten stuck and gone off on a useless excursion for lack of considering the actual problem being faced.
I have only two suggestions:
-
Distill the chapter into a single sentence with at most two dependent clauses. There's obviously an inciting event, but that may be a red herring when figuring out what the chapter is for in the larger narrative. Ultimately, it needs to advance the story, and determining how that occurs (later themes that become at least incipient at this juncture are good threads to pull on) can bring the structure and flow into sharper focus.
-
Immerse yourself in what you can from that era. Music is going to be easiest; depending on how far you're looking back, little else such as landmarks may be left. If you were writing at the time (either journaling or personal communication), that's obviously going to be a more reliable form of memory than viewing things from across decades -- and you can't plagiarize yourself, so don't shy away from your own primary sources.
Though The Intercept is a nonprofit, the personal-use provision prohibits reposting stories (as has been done here) online. In the future, if you want to excerpt a piece, or provide a summary (no LLMs, for the love of god), that's fine, but whole articles are not something we do here for legal reasons. It's irrelevant to the liability of Beehaw what your take on copyright is.
As for CW's, if you want to be that verbose, mark the post NSFW and then list them at the top of the body.
Ultimately, none of that saves the placement of an opinion piece in U.S. News. Stories that have a political slant belong in politics, as mentioned in the sidebar.
If you'd like to repost in Politics, I'm sure it will be welcome there.
I trust Steam thus far. But music, I buy and download. Between my computer, my phone and a backup drive, I feel pretty good that I'll be able to listen for the foreseeable future. Movies and TV, I also donnload.
This has no nexus to the U.S., so I'm removing it.
No worries! I was just confused as to the provenance. A typo would usually be prescribed as the explanation by Occam, but with the bullshit Musk and his henchmen get up to, it's not a safe guess.
I don't know anyone rich enough to be a "centrist" Democrat. Incremental change could have worked thirty years ago, but at this point, the system is too fucked for that.
The fifth word of the comment I replied to.
X is a terrible source for anything Tesla related. Here, it's self evident: The driver wasn't a woman. If they can't get that right from the police report, why believe anything after the misgendering? "I read elsewhere" often means "I believe anything I'm told, especially if I prefer that story."
Embrace, extend, extinguish has a long and storied domestic history. But when China does it, it's bad. These days, we copy them at least as much as they copy us.

As analysis, this belongs in Politics. Feel free to repost there.