1
95
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

Hey folks. I just want to check in with the community about a post that was recently removed. My intention is absolutely not to create drama or stir anything up, but I'd like to make sure you all understand my reasoning for removing the post. Also, I'm aware that I'm not as good at articulating these kinds of things as some of our folks, so don't expect a classic Beehaw philosophy post here.

The post in questions was a link to a twitter thread providing evidence of the IRL identity of "comic" "artist" stonetoss, who is unquestionably a huge piece of shit and a neo-nazi, or at least something so indistinguishable from one that the difference is meaningless.

The post provoked some discussion in the Mod chat and several of us, myself included, were on the fence about it. I understand that there are arguments both for and against naming and calling out people like stonetoss. I find arguments in both directions somewhat convincing, but ultimately the thing that a number of us expressed was that the act of calling someone like this out and potentially exposing them to harassment or real-world consequences for their views might be morally defensible, it didn't feel like Beehaw was the right place for it. We really want Beehaw to be a place that is constructive and kind, and that this type of doxxing/callout didn't seem to fit our vision what what we want Beehaw to be. At the same time, we're all very conscious that it would be easy for this kind of thinking to lead to tone policing and respectability politics, and that is also something we want to be careful to avoid. All this to say that I made what I think was the best decision in the moment for the overall health of !politics as a community, as I saw it.

On a personal note, I find that our Politics community is one of the communities that is most prone to falling into some of the traps that Beehaw was created to avoid. That's very understandable - politics are something that cause real and immediate harm and stress in a lot of folks' lives; they're complicated, contentious, and often make us feel powerless. I'd like to remind folks as we move into the general election season in the US, though, to remember the founding principles of Beehaw when discussing these topics, no matter how stressful they may be: remember the human, assume good faith in others, and above all, be(e) nice.

Thanks,

TheRtRevKaiser

2
13

a.k.a. 6 people that would have a better chance than Joe Biden at beating Donald Trump in November. Also Kamala Harris is here.

3
56
submitted 1 day ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
4
95

Seriously, Joe, do you not know the stakes? "Sure, America fell to fascism, but I tried my best." For fucks sake, Trump has straight up said he was going to be a dictator, and the Supreme Court will back him all the way. It's unbelievable that all that stands between us and the fall of the republic is a man in his 80s who isn't fully cognizant of the situation.

5
88

It doesn't matter if you're a Labor fan, the good times won't last. If you don't install proportional representation this will come back to bite you in the ass as it has before.

6
12
submitted 1 day ago by Recant@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org
7
7
A Fool's Hope (www.the-reframe.com)
8
53
submitted 2 days ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
9
67
submitted 3 days ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
10
110
submitted 4 days ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
11
150
submitted 4 days ago by Kwakigra@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

Speaks for itself. We've been beyond satire for a long time but this one still got me.

12
112
submitted 5 days ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
13
41
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by godzilla_lives@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

Relevant portion of interview here.

“I think it’s a legitimate question to say, is this an episode or is this a condition? When people ask that question, it’s completely legitimate — of both candidates.”


Of course she's quick to "both-sides" the night, but that's politics for you. If she's saying this during an interview, I can only speculate on what's going on behind closed doors. The wagons are not closing around the Biden campaign.

14
6
15
64
16
5

Donald Trump's lawyers are seeking to vacate his New York hush money conviction based on Monday's Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.

17
6
Radical, in a Different Vein (www.eatingpolicy.com)
18
2
submitted 1 week ago by Kissaki@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org
19
60
20
16
submitted 1 week ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
21
106
22
96

There is always an incredible amount of fear-mongering and general negativity in the US media. This is especially so for politics.

Here is my unsolicited advice:

  1. Ignore the media including polls.
  2. If you are capable, then please do some canvasing.
  3. Vote and encourage those around you to vote.
23
77
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by t3rmit3@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

This sucks. This is leaning further into the Major Questions Doctrine that SCOTUS has been pushing, where agencies and their actually knowledgeable, employed scientists and technical experts, have no real control over regulatory policies, and instead are beholden to Congress and judges to decide e.g. how many ppm of a chemical is safe for people to drink.

24
17
25
23
submitted 1 week ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
view more: next ›

Politics

10112 readers
242 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS