107
submitted 5 months ago by Squire1039@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Researchers presented new techniques to fight sophisticated hacking at a tech conference. Here are the highlights:

Self-destruct chips:

  • A team from Vermont and Marvell created chips with unique fingerprints that can destroy themselves (through increased voltage) if tampered with. This prevents both counterfeiting and unauthorized access to information.
  • Probe detection: Columbia and Intel researchers developed a circuit that detects probes attached to a circuit board, preventing hackers from gaining physical control of a system.
  • Signal Obscuring: Researchers from Texas and Intel created a method to hide a chip's power and electromagnetic signals, making it harder for attackers to steal information.

These innovations could improve chip security and save businesses billions from chip counterfeiting.

Comments

NGL. After I saw "Self-destruct chips", I was just overwhelmed by Mission Impossible theme song.

https://youtu.be/PeKW0stTThk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 4am@lemm.ee 38 points 5 months ago

“Billions lost to counterfeit chips” yeah all those garage fabs cranking out fake 4090s are the REAL problem in the market

This will be used for enforcing subscriptions on enterprise gear, I promise.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If these aren't too costly to implement and game consoles continue to use specialized hardware, this could be used to seriously hamper attempts at reverse engineering for modchips and similar things.

It also could be disasterous for right to repair, and against hobbists keeping old hardware running by using third party modifications decades after the end of a product's life.

I'd also question how much of chip design "piracy" is actually done by reverse engineering nowadays vs corporate espionage or leaks of internal design docs.

[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Reverse engineering of hardware is quickly becoming too complex for non-machine-assisted workflows. I’d imagine this type of destructive chip really only makes sense cryptology modules, but unless a designer can also manufacture the chip in-house or otherwise guarantee against supply chain attacks, this is a half measure.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
107 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

57226 readers
4608 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS