494
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Trans youth will no longer be prescribed puberty blockers at NHS England gender identity clinics in a new “blow” to gender-affirming healthcare.

Puberty blockers are a type of medicine that prevent puberty from starting by blocking the hormones – like testosterone and oestrogen – that lead to puberty-related changes in the body. In the case of trans youth, this can delay unwanted physical changes like menstruation, breast growth, voice changes or facial hair growth.

On Tuesday (12 March), NHS England confirmed the medicine, which has been described as “life-saving” medical care for trans youth, will only be available to young people as part of clinical research trials.

The government described the move as a “landmark decision”, Sky News reported. It believed such a move is in the “best interests of the child”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago

I dont want to speak to the social aspect of this issue, but I have to imagine that blocking puberty has some crazy side effects. How long has this medical technology been in use and where can I find studies about it? Again, I know this is sensitive and I am just curious from a biological standpoint.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 126 points 6 months ago

blocking puberty has some crazy side effects.

I'm a provider at a children's hospital. I specialize in orthopedics and rehabilitation, so I mostly deal with the musculoskeletal system. I have colleagues who would be able to provide a much better and more in depth explanation, but I will do my best.

Even in orthopedics "hormone blockers" are used fairly frequently. For example the same drugs that people use to transition are utilized to moderate the epiphyseal fusion of growth plates. Puberty is also frequently delayed to moderate the hormone levels of juvenile cancer patients. Or even more increasingly common, to halt the symptoms of precocious puberty in young women.

The vast majority of juveniles prescribed hormones to delay puberty are for non gender affirming care like cancer. The problem with moderating what medical providers can and can't treat is that you are assuming you know more about medicine than the a person who went to medical school.

You may be trying to protect kids, but what ends up happening is an interference of medical care, and usually not the type you intended. If hormone drugs become more monitored, providers may be hesitant, or have a more difficult brine prescribing it.

The dangers of delaying puberty are very small, when you stop the prescription puberty begins again. Usually the only side effect is excessive growth due to a delay if epiphyseal fusion. In regards to gender affirming care, I will remind people that their providers are looking at total outcomes. Meaning they are factoring in things like the higher potentiality of self harm and suicide.

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Thank you for your reply! This is good information

[-] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

That's why I browse Lemmy. Thank you.

[-] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Precocious puberty has been a thing forever and the first medications for delaying it by regulating hormones have been around since the 1980s. I think that should be the jumping off point for research. However afaik the same sorts of drugs are also commonly used to treat cancer in adults.

Here is an article about their use in treating trans people with links to various studies https://transfemscience.org/articles/puberty-blockers/

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Thank you for the info and link! I will read up

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

How long has this medical technology been in use and where can I find studies about it?

Decades. It was there when I was a kid, so like 20 years ago. And it wasn't new medical technology at the time.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

I have to imagine that blocking puberty has some crazy side effects.

Sort of the joke. Puberty is what has the crazy side effects.

[-] Lyrl@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago

It reduces bone density. Not to unhealthy levels in teens, but there are concerns the lower baseline will increase osteoporosis risk when the patients get to old age.

They can also only be used for a couple of years. Some non-binary people want to be on them permanently, but doctors won't prescribe that. Some kids want more time to decide, and unfortunately there isn't anything safe to use through the full teenage years.

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

It has very few side effects and is completely reversible.

[-] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The side effects and risks are worth it when you only get one shot at puberty. If you don't transition as a pre-pubescent teenager, you will never "pass" as well, especially as a transwoman.

A really good example of how successful you can be if you're early is Corey Maison. There are cases of transition regret of course, but they're still a very small percentage of the total, and that percentage is reduced by puberty blockers giving young people more time to figure out themselves and their own bodies, and to make the choice that's right for them.

[-] VR20X6@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah, that's the gravity of things that people don't seem to understand. Yes, there can be unwanted side effects from puberty blockers, but they are relatively minor. On the other hand, one possible side effect for people that are willing to brave those puberty blocker side effects but aren't allowed to do so is suicide. This is unfortunately often life or death.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

There's some studies that found that bone density could be affected, but considering the suicide rate of trans people I'm going to say that's a tiny sacrifice for the assurance that you can have the body your brain wants to be in.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Discovered in 1971, and introduced for medical use in the 1980s.

"Where can I find studies about it"?

Have you tried perhaps, idk, a search engine? How do I have a feeling that even if I were to show you the science which agrees that they are safe medications, you'd have an "argument" in which you criticise the info without even reading it.

People perfectly well know how to look for things online, and when they pretend not to... well, it smells fishy. Fishy, like sealions.

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

You seem really unpleasant. Good luck out there, friend.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

You seem really pretentious.

I hope you get over that. I can give you some contacts if you need a good therapist, buddy.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -5 points 6 months ago

your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
494 points (96.1% liked)

World News

38531 readers
3028 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS