150
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by cosecantphi@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

Recent example is Intel dropping the i from their CPU branding. What was an Intel Core i7 is now an "Intel Core Ultra 7". This is a bizarre choice. The i3, i5, and i7 branding is very much a household name, and they're just throwing that away.

Infinitely worse, they've also thrown out their low end Pentium and Celeron CPU branding. Now they're simply calling them all a generic "Intel Processor". What the actual fuck? People avoid Pentiums and Celerons because they're widely regarded the absolute bottom of the silicon barrel. Now instead of "don't get a Celeron, it's practically e-waste" it's going to be "don't get an INTEL PROCESSOR, it's practically e-waste". Holy shit.

A bunch of rich fucking failchildren got paid the big bucks for these ideas meanwhile I'm making min wage working infinitely harder while actually producing a non-negative surplus value for my employer to steal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frogbellyratbone_@hexbear.net 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

the real marketing is the marketing they do to their bosses or clients, not to the consumers

remember back in 2010 whatever when that graphic designer convinced pepsi execs to pay them $15 whatever million to redo the pepsi logo and they just made it all wavey, sold a BS sale pitch about it's like the globe now, and ended up writing a blog post laughing their asses off at it? you love to see it.

[-] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

Here's an old post with a link to the design doc

@cosecantphi@hexbear.net

https://hexbear.net/post/96951

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

How could I forget when we have it in emoji form? brand-eternal

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Most of the executives and internal marketers knew it was absolute horseshit, they just knew that if the brand change lost 2% sales instead of gained 2% sales, they would face worse personal consequences if they spent 20k on the rebrand than if they spent 15 million on the rebrand.

Because capitalism is the most efficient system

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago
[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
150 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23219 readers
452 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS