137
Weird (hexbear.net)

They were late smh my head

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rojo27@hexbear.net 42 points 7 months ago

Didn't ISIS also claim responsibility for an attack in Iran in the early days of the Gaza genocide? Very convienent for the US, Israel, and Ukraine.

[-] Nomisslehere@hexbear.net 30 points 7 months ago

There was also an attack in Afghanistan after the US left

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 23 points 7 months ago

It was as they were leaving, and it was an attempt to get the US to stay

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 19 points 7 months ago

maybe i shouldn't be but i'm less suspicious about the ISIS-K thing there, some splinter groups aren't gonna like the taliban for local splitter reasons

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 18 points 7 months ago

Yet they wait until the day the US is withdrawing to do it? Come on

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 8 points 7 months ago

no that kinda makes sense to me too, taliban is busy filling the vacuum so if you want some territory grab it while they're busy and when you're not going to get third-partied by an airstrike.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

ISIS-K is not capable of holding territory, they're a tiny tiny splinter faction. If they wanted a vacuum, they should have waited until US was gone. Instead, they attack as US was still there. They are only capable of terrorist attacks but not capable of holding territory. They never did any major attacks until the day America is leaving, then they attack an airport with both Taliban and US present to try and drag US back into Afghanistan for "counter-terrorism". This is the ISIS-CIA playbook, and I think you're a fool if you deny it. If you didn't pay painstaking attention to detail in the Syrian War, I would advise you not to speak where you are not educated.

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

i'm just saying it's operationally plausible to act on that day from the perspective of a local belligerent, not that it definitely wasn't the CIA.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If they wanted to exploit a vacuum and avoid US airstrikes they would have waited a day or two and not struck right when they did. The only plausible reason for the strike was desperation to keep their allies around. This was a common and repeated tactic in Syria to allow US to get a foothold

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13489 readers
691 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS