20
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by dandroid@dandroid.app to c/hockey@lemmy.ca
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] asymmetric@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Love the player, hate the contract.

Good for him, I guess... bad for the Leafs long term success.

[-] Osiris@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Honestly insane. He was probably their best piece to move for a high tier dman. Instead the leafs are going to keep running the same lineup that's had no playoff success

[-] dandroid@dandroid.app 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And with a full NMC over the whole contract according to capfriendly.

[-] remus989@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You're kidding right? Surely they didn't give him a full NMC...

[-] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

I've said a lot that Toronto has a problem with players wanting to be paid before showing the results of why they should get paid. Most everytime I'm told I don't know anything

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He’s their only elimination game performer

And their only player that can enter the zone without getting a running start from their blue line

You can hate every other contract but this is good for the team

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 2 points 5 months ago

Okay but why now? Why did this have to happen in January? If you're going to pay him all this money, give him all this term, and a NMC/NTC, why not wait until June when you either know he's earned it or get him on a bit of a discount. It just makes no sense even if you think he's worth it

[-] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah but this just sets another example that everyone there should ask for max value

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If your best player takes a contract that isn’t the most on the team then it doesn’t say you should take max value

Also Marner and Tavares are up for a pay reduction which should help

[-] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

You know, I forgot how bad Toronto signings are. Got spoiled by the tampa players taking discounts to win the cup.

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

It's a weird thing in sports. For most people, you get annual performance reviews -- did you hit your KPIs? What's your bonus this year, if any? A salary increase that tracks inflation, or maybe you're a better worker than that...

In sports: "how much revenue will this player create for us over this period" -- they are a product, and you're trying to recoup costs. Signing Nylander must at least create $11.5M in revenue for the leafs each year, right? In advertising, brand recognition, jersey sales, whatever. That's all that matters here. Not whether or not it makes the Leafs competitive. Not whether his value on the market is fair. And since Rogers and Bell own 75% of the company, they can make it happen, whether we want it to or not.

In many ways, the small markets are so much better off here. There's no way Chevy (in Winnipeg) would have signed this contract.

[-] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Sure, they're allowed to go for jersey sales and whatnot. Normally it makes me happier in the post season haha

I mean, seeing Toronto get their hopes up just to be smashed down again was hilarious, but yeah

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Good for the Leafs they now have their best player with the 6th highest contract in the league and they finally were able to get term

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
20 points (95.5% liked)

Hockey

2262 readers
1 users here now

Rules

List of Team-Specific Communities:

Metropolitan Division

Atlantic Division

Central Division

Pacific Division

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS