this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
70 points (91.7% liked)

politics

24585 readers
2873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The majority of book challenges in the United States came from 11 people.

I knew it would be few, but it's very very few.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've actually met one of those 11 scumbags at a Florida school board meeting. Gave my wife & daughter the ick just being in the same room with him. Bigtime Pedo Preacher vibes.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Completely unsurprising the one you met is creepy and that it's such a small number of people filing all the nonsense.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about this? Repeal the whole god damned thing and put the books back on the shelves where they belong.

And after they're all put back on the shelves, if people sincerely believe a book should be removed, let them go in front of the school board, or whatever, pay the $100 a whack, and explain in detail which books need to be banned and why. Cite literal pages, illustrations, and/or quotes, and explain why it's inappropriate.

Watch how quickly shit like this stops when the people submitting hundreds of frivilous bans at a time when they actually have to have some skin in the game. It's easy to come up with titles of 2800 books they've probably never read; I could probably compile a list like that in an hour. But now let's see them have to not only cough up the dough for wasting everyone's time with this frivilous nonsense, but their own time as well not only reading the books but having to stand up there and testify to why it needs to be banned.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Anyone remember that lady that was using the book ban in Texas to remove Scholastic books and do away with the book fair and failed to mention that she was employed by Scholastic's competitor?

I sure do.

Neither Brave Books nor Burkhardt disclosed that Burkhardt is an employee of Brave Books

That's always the fun thing about any law, but especially of really stupid ones. Give people and inch and they will abuse the fuck out of anything for their own gains.

[–] Aesculapius@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The wheels of democracy turn slowly, but they do turn. Should it have gotten anywhere close to this far? Hell no. But this does bring me some very very cautious optimism.

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"Have you no sense of literacy"