117
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

I thought the consensus was Neanderthals were just as intelligent as humans.

It's just humans reproduced faster. So even though Neanderthals were stronger, their population was just sustainable compared to the cancer like expansion of humans.

Reminds me of the phone cleaners from Hitchhikers Guide...

[-] DODOKING38@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I also remember reading in an article like this that there is not much of a difference between modern and neanderthal age brains as well, the difference is a longer recorded history and accumulated knowledge

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

That's like we used to think early hominids all lived in caves, because that's where we kept finding remains...

It took way to long to realize that's just where conditions were best for remains and artifacts to stay preserved.

Most didn't live in caves, if anything they were more like emergency shelters than every day homes.

[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I always imagined early hominids were just like us. Some were smarter, some less so. One of them might have a brilliant idea and invent some stuff like that adhesive, teaches his group about it. The only difference today is the spread of information. It's not that we're smarter, it's that we've hugely improved our ability to share knowledge.

[-] Dussel@fediscience.org 12 points 6 months ago

@givesomefucks @fossilesque

True: demography seems key.

To my frustration, the media still loves to frame any new information on the Palaeolithic against the outdated frame that Neanderthals were dumb.

No matter how much you insist Neanderthals are interesting in their own right, it always ends up with a comparison to "us".

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 16 points 6 months ago

Go read Dawn of Humanity if you want your mind blown about early man.

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

Do you mean dawn of everything?

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

So sorry - you're correct. Full title is The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity

Guess my brain shortened it sorry!

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks, it looks very interesting and useful for my work!

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
117 points (98.3% liked)

Archaeology

2127 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/Archaeology @ Mander.xyz!

Shovelbums welcome. 🗿


Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.


About

Archaeology or archeology[a] is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes.

Archaeology has various goals, which range from understanding culture history to reconstructing past lifeways to documenting and explaining changes in human societies through time.

The discipline involves surveying, excavation, and eventually analysis of data collected, to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross-disciplinary research. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. No pseudoscience/pseudoarchaeology.



Links

Archaeology 101:

Get Involved:

University and Field Work:

Jobs and Career:

Professional Organisations:

FOSS Tools:

Datasets:

Fun:

Other Resources:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes


Find us on Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS