176

Shant Soghomonian was charged over attack on the office in which staffers were working but none were reported injured

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] athos77@kbin.social 50 points 8 months ago

investigators have yet to release details about a possible a motive.

I'm pretty sure we can all guess what it is ....

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Gravy Seal on top secret Q-mission I'd wager.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 42 points 8 months ago

I know Bernie thanked all the first responders but I also want to thank the people who decided buildings should have sprinkler systems in them, which is ultimately what suppressed the fire. Engineered safety systems are a person's best friend.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

but I also want to thank the people who decided buildings should have sprinkler systems in them, which is ultimately what suppressed the fire. Engineered safety systems are a person’s best friend.

Remember this the next time a conservative tries to advocate for removing or preventing new regulations in the name of "cutting red tape" and other pro-business nonsense. Especially when those regulations are about safety. If we didn't have those, people would still be dying en-masse in mines due to silicosis and other lung conditions. And car manufacturers would limit their safety systems (including seatbelts) in order to minimize costs.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

My brain went dyslexic for a second. At first I read this as "Bernie Sanders arrested in suspected arson attack", and had to do a serious double take.

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago
[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

"I tried, you little shits"
-Burny Enders

[-] seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

Burny Embers

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

"The Burlington police department said the fire engulfing the door and part of the vestibule had impeded “staff members who were working in the office” from exiting, which endangered their lives."

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

He Shant get away with this.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
176 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS