this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
66 points (89.3% liked)

MapPorn

3354 readers
1 users here now

Discover Cartographic Marvels and Navigate New Worlds!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The global spread of the Indo-european language family

@mapporn

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Huh no one in Alice Springs speaks English?

That’s a very uh … unique way to map Australia.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 10 months ago

Sounds right to me

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How is no one in 1950 native to European languages in africa besides south africa?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing, it doesn't list the colonizers there, because in terms of numbers, they're irrelevant...

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, let's ignore the whole of the Americas and Australia.

Lots of people in African ex colonies are native speakers of Portuguese and French. I presume this was already the case in 1950.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then I guess, I was guessing wrong? I'm not trying to claim anything and I did specify "there", because I did notice the Americas and Australia. I assumed, the definition of "native speaker" was maybe a bit special here...

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's confusing specially because it highlights south africa but nothing else.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My thinking was that South Africa might have had more immigrants from Europe and such than e.g. Congo. At least, I believe, South Africa is particularly known for having many white folks there. But yeah, I'm also just spitballing...

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

There are too many French-speaking people in Africa, even as a second language, to ignore in this map. French being maybe an unofficial, but definitely shared language among different regions and nations across most of the continent. For example, how someone from Nigeria would communicate with someone from Cameroon.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is that strip across Russia simply the populated parts of Russia? Presumably, the North is too cold for much more than a few secluded villages...

For a moment, I thought, that might be a remnant of the Silk Road, but that was quite a bit further south...

[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Modern silk road, called trans-siberian railway, the railroad through Russia. Factories and cities were built next to the railroad. A lot of other nations live in russia, but they are not indo-europeans, and much smaller in numbers.

There are 25 regional official languages in russia, only 2 of them indo-european: Osetian and Ukrainian. Most others are Turkic and Uralic https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Russia

Also this map is shitty, as it doesn't show what percentage of people speak the language, 51% looks the same as 99%.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Time to go research those gaps in Europe

[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The small gap in Northern Spain are Basques, other gaps are the Ural guys, Finno-Ugric languages:

  • The big hole in the middle is Hungarians in Hungary and Southern Slovakia
  • The smaller hole a bit to the East are Hungarians in Romania, aka Szeklers
  • In the North Finns in Finland and Estonians in Estonia
  • Even Norther the Sámi people, they live in Finland, Norway and Sweden, but on this map they are part of the Finnish gap.

There are some Turkic language speakers as well, but they are so small, they are not visible on the map, e.g. Gagauz people in Southern Ukraine. And some part of Turkey is in geographical Europe.

There are much more gaps in European Russia, mostly other Turkic and Finno-Ugric languages. Here is a nice map showing them. And the 100s of different small languages of the Caucasus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_the_Caucasus

[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 14 points 10 months ago

Those are Finland (other more northern one) and Hungary, whose languages belong to the Finno-Ugric family

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

ez, it's Basque the ooooold language isolate in Spain, and then the Uralic languages: Hungarian, Estonian, Finnish

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It's true, we still don't speak English in northern Queensland (Australia) lol

Howyagoincuntay?

[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

@andrew Is the square in SW US Diné? Not sure what it would look like in 1950.