229

RFK Jr. Says Doctors Found a Dead Worm in His Brain: Report (www.thedailybeast.com)

submitted 4 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 2) 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Jafoo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Let's hope they soon discover and rid him of all the lives ones which continue to devour his grey matter

[-] Treczoks@kbin.social 4 points 4 months ago

FTFY: RFK Jr. Says Doctors Found a Dead Worm ~~in~~ as His Brain: Report

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Presidential candidates looking good this year:

Old guy who bicycles

Old guy who golfs

Guy with literal brain worms

[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That family is plagued by fate. Ts ts. One could think it's karma.

[-] Welt@lazysoci.al 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe they all had brainworms. Maybe they burst out of JFK and in fact there was no second shooter?

[-] DoctorButts@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 4 months ago

Lol

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

His head just did that.

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Uhhh what?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

He isn't a bad person seemingly, but thoroughly crazy, so this makes sense.

I mean, I have more friends like this than enemies, so I'm biased and consider this to be better than a bad person who isn't.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024

229 points (96.7% liked)

politics

18821 readers

4657 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News