711
submitted 7 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

Without paywall: https://archive.ph/0KvTq

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 237 points 7 months ago

the most insulting part of this is 'people' suddenly pretending like we love and always loved the office, when it's been a fundamental symbol of stagnation and boredom and misery in culture ever since they became widespread. NO ONE would voluntary want to spend 5 days in a shitty building after a commute wearing clothes they don't want to with bosses sniffing around their necks all day leaving maybe 4 hrs a day to yourself in your home. 'top talent' or not, everyone deserves to be able to work where they feel most comfortable.

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 134 points 7 months ago

People used to make sardonic jokes about cubicles. Then cubicles disappeared in favor of the open office and somehow the jokes stopped, just as things got worse.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 87 points 7 months ago

Open Office was a cesspool of disease, even before covid it was problematic:

https://www.passporthealthusa.com/employer-solutions/blog/2020-2-how-do-open-offices-affect-employee-health/

Studies have found that that those who work in open offices are more likely to take short term sick leave or a sick day. Those employees might be using 62% more of their sick days due to the environment. Employees with this office layout are also more prone to headaches and respiratory problems due to weakened immune systems.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 122 points 7 months ago

Open Office was a cesspool of disease, even before covid it was problematic:

Thankfully enough people realised this and switched to Libre.

[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Nerd.

I like you.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago

Through the course of my career I've somehow lost office space as I've ascended the corporate food chain. I had a private office/technician room in my first job out, then had an eight foot cubicle with high walls, then a six foot cubicle with low dividers, and then the pandemic hit. The operations guy at the last place was making noises about a benching arrangement after RTO, like people were going to put up with being elbow to elbow with Chris The Conference Call Yeller and Brenda The Lip Smacking Snacker while Team Loudly Debates Marvel Movie Trivia is yammering away the next row over.

Hell, if it meant getting a space to myself with enough privacy to hear my own thoughts I might consider giving up my current WFH gig. But everybody's obsessed with building awful office hellscapes and I don't have the constitution to put up with that kind of environment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 143 points 7 months ago

This is absolutely to be expected. If I was able to work from home remotely and then was told I'd have to go back, I would look for another job with the specific requirement that I must be able to work from home.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 84 points 7 months ago

Right?

To whom is this not obvious? Top talent has options.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 64 points 7 months ago

Most upper management don't know anything except meeting numbers and the need to look authoritative so no one realizes how redundant they are.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Everyone needs to realize that this is the truest thing you'll ever hear about business.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 17 points 7 months ago

Im open to in office. Just add 7.5k to base pay for each day in office provided it located in my relatively affordable location.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 140 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You give your top talent what they want. The problem is that they hired a consultant to find out what that was. The consultant, knowing on which side his bread was buttered, told the board what they wanted to hear, which is, after all, why they hired a consultant instead of just asking.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 41 points 7 months ago

It's a balancing act though. A lot of top talent is going to leave either way, so over focusing on them hurts everyone else. Mandatory return to office was a lot more costly than most companies hoped for though. It was essentially a lay-off, but it left companies with pretty much only the bad employees compared to a more traditional approach.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We can't claim to know it left them with "bad" employees. I think there's vanishingly little evidence that recruiters actually go after the "good" employees effectively -- I'm pretty skeptical that a pro recruiter actually gets you better employees, they just make the process of getting employees way less stressful. We also have no reason to assume that a good or bad employee is correlated in any way with caring about not returning to office -- it's possible very bad employees are just as likely to quit as very good ones. How do you even tell good from bad, anyway?

What this "return to office" stuff definitely DOES do is preferentially retain the most obedient/desperate employees. Which may be part of the goal, along with low-key downsizing.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago

I feel like im always explaining to recruiters what it sounds like the role they sent to me is actually looking for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 31 points 7 months ago

Also, when it goes south, they can pin the blame on the consultant instead of themselves.

[-] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

That's exactly what the consultants are for and hiring them is an easy, low-cost (in the grand scheme of things) way of shifting responsibility aka "I don't want to do any decision making that may and will be detrimental to the company so I will hire an "expert" to do it for me".

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 116 points 7 months ago

My manager didn't care for it when I pointed out that making us go into the office three times per week was equivalent to an approximately $5,000 pay cut. Not including wear and tear on the car.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago

That sounds like a low estimate.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 38 points 7 months ago

If a manager can’t appear useful to their superiors, that’s 100% pay cut for them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 114 points 7 months ago

Forget the cost of travel, if my commute is one hour, that's two per day, ten per week, that's an EXTRA WEEK they demand that I donate of my time to the company each month.

Ain't happening.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago

And it's not even a week off halfway useful time. It's a week of fucking sitting in traffic breathing in exhaust and break fumes.

[-] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

If you drive. If you use public transport you can inhale other people's BO instead.

But yes, if you commute, nobody gains only you lose.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 16 points 7 months ago

And it’s not like public transportation (at least here in the USA) is worth a shit, it’s an option of last resort.

It would take me three hours to get to my job using a bus due to the routes. To get home even longer because the buses stop running and I would have to ride my bike at sunset.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

And on top of it, the commute is costing money, too. Either public transport tickets or fuel and wear an tear on car.

I can so much understand my former coworker. He switched jobs because not only did they pay more, but now he has a five minute commute instead of a one hour one.

[-] Melkath@kbin.social 111 points 7 months ago

My company ordered back to office, and as I was told, I was the only one to say no.

I generate too much value and have tolerated being underpayed enough that they can't justify firing me.

I'm also not some MIT AI machine learning savant. I come from a business analyst/ QA background, and I have made a SQL/Java/VBA system for virtually free that does the work of a team of 10 every day, but it's just my underpaid ass running it.

When I lose this job, honestly, I'm fucked and it will be a nightmare because I'll probably need to go into an office, and I'm in no shape for that.

But for today, I said no and I keep doing my job.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 117 points 7 months ago

When I lose this job, honestly, I'm fucked and it will be a nightmare because I'll probably need to go into an office, and I'm in no shape for that.

Which is why you should be looking for another job that ticks all your checkboxes while you have this job.

[-] griD@feddit.de 23 points 7 months ago

Very sound advice.

[-] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

You need to demand a raise. And keep working from home.

[-] Melkath@kbin.social 24 points 7 months ago

That's been the tactic.

Baby steps.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eee@lemm.ee 108 points 7 months ago

Apparently smaller tech firms are loving office mandates, because it allows them to hire talent that they normally would not have access to at their budget.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 65 points 7 months ago

Yep. I'm willing to make 10% less to be fully remote. Given the alternative is fewer days of sleep each year, plus many more in time spent grooming and transiting, then the cost of transport and lunch, to ultimately get less done, both at home and at work (with the same deadlines) I might even take 15-20% less.

Work/life balance is more important than money.

[-] Tinks@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

My company is based in CA, and employs me remotely from the Midwest. They pay me above average for my area, but less than they would have to if I lived in the Bay area where they are based. I feel like this works out for both of us! They even go so far as looking at the zip code of every employee when considering raises, and thus far (3 years) I have received an annual raise which is higher than the cost of living increase for my area.

In my situation at least, me working remotely benefits both myself and my company. I just can't understand why so many larger companies are so adamant about return to office, especially ones in larger coastal cities.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 75 points 7 months ago

I work for a 350k+ company doing grid mod for energy utilities. The head of our division had an "all hands" meeting earlier in the week saying based on client requirements we all need to be in an office or on the clients site.

The head of our group of ~20 (my bosses boss) scheduled a meeting right after and said ignore that. Our team is kicking ass and our current client has not such requirements (other than onsite at their location for training/go-lives which is reasonable). Furthermore, he said unless it was out of his hands this could be the normal with new clients.

We have a killer team from all over the US (many of whom are nowhere near the client or our company offices). This team would dissolve quickly if that mandate ever hit us.

My point is, there ARE still people in upper(ish) management that understand to keep top talent you have to be willing to accept or embrace work from wherever. Hell, during the last go-live last hear he basically said unless absolutely required he didn't WANT any of us on-site with the client. He wanted us all comfy, no jet-lag, in our normal settings to be able to troubleshoot issues. Granted, I worked nearly 80 hours that week, but that's not a normal week. I usually work 30-40.

lol and holy wall of text batman. I didn't mean to write that much but it's here and I don't want to delete it.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yup. We got a new CEO, and they did a big push for productivity and enforcing our 3-day in office policy. My team had been on 2-day since the pandemic WFH policy ended, and my boss said we'd give it a try, and if it sucked we could go back. We had worse productivity, so we went back to 2-days in-office. The company policy is still 3-days in office, we just ignore it.

It really depends on your boss. A good boss can ignore stupid company policy, and a bad boss can ruin good company policy. My boss is one of the main reasons I took the job, and it's also why I'm still here (I'm pretty sure I'm underpaid, and my boss is upfront about that, but I like my boss so I'm sticking with it for now).

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 18 points 7 months ago

Similar to my case. My manager is based in Europe, and he basically said that to him, I’m a remote employee whether I wfh or go to the office, so it doesn’t matter. And even for other team members in the same location as him, he doesn’t force them to come in.

Our director (my boss’ boss) moved out of the US so it doesn’t make sense for him to ask us to come in when he himself is remote. And he also told us that he doesn’t care where we work from.

We’re lucky our bosses aren’t old heads with outdated work principles. Barring any explicit orders from the very top, I expect to keep the status quo. And even then, I’m sure at least up to our VP will defy those orders.

[-] Kadaj21@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Yeah our CIO started talking bringing cubes back. My manager, his manner and our director are pretty opposed to this. We do well remote and there are things we literally couldn’t do in the office. We’re in once a week-ish if it works out and if this forced our director would have to move back from multiple states over…. I don’t think they’ll make that move back if pressed and one co-worker expressed “fire me” sentiment if it comes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago

People who have headhunters lining at the door do not want to be office slaves? Unbelievable.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 66 points 7 months ago
[-] Fontasia@feddit.nl 29 points 7 months ago

If this would have surprised no one they wouldn't have done it and just ate the cost of office spaec. No, there's people out there who still think company loyalty is a thing and that fostering a "company culture" is actually viable.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

It absolutely is. If you treat your employees like human beings, they'll reward you with loyalty. But that just doesn't seem to be a thing any more in the US.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Romeowns@lemmy.world 62 points 7 months ago

The push to return to office is nothing more than a push to thin out the numbers. Much cheaper for them to jump themselves than be pushed by management.

[-] RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world 74 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, it is just incompetence. There's a serious disconnect between the people making the return to office call and the people dealing with it. The thinking is that, over years, the talent lost will be replaced and the backlash will subside and whatever reason they have for the RTO is more important than these.

The trouble with the software industry upper management is that they have never had to deal with an industry in trouble. They've been working in a rapidly growing industry for their whole career. Bad decisions matter very little in such environments so they think they don't make any.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 20 points 7 months ago

Also most of these people in management roles seldom are the ones doing anything. A lot of them are either HR MBA type people, or sales. They don’t know anything of how a company actually works, what the jobs entail, or how to run a company.

Usually these companies all run in spite of them doing their best efforts to make it run as awful as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago

No shit. Leave us the hell alone so we can focus on deliverables.

The whoe "tech layoffs" always sound scary, but we are still in high demand. And we'll keep jumping because fuck your BS micromanagement.

[-] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Everyone in this thread is saying that this comes as no surprise, and that is certainly true. But the thing is, a lot of management types do know this already but they simply don't care for two reasons:

  1. They care more about leverage/control over employees than they do about actual good work being done. You cannot understate at all how important employee control can be for managers and how seriously they're willing to destroy their own business to keep this kind of power.

  2. RTO is basically a layoff program. As much as I love working remotely, it's very important to keep in mind that remote workers are the first ones that will get laid off when the business wants to cut back - purely because of how easy it is to do. They can just mandate RTO without actually calling it a layoff and know many workers will outright quit, and the business won't have to comply with whatever local regulations are in place around layoffs. Still, this shouldn't sound like comfort for employees that do work in the office - there's a good chance that once RTO is in place, another round of layoffs will strike when the company doesn't meet its cut targets. So any time a business announces return to office, it means that there's a good chance that layoffs will follow too.

tl;dr: Managers knew this would happen all along too - it was just a trade they were very willing to make.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago

can confirm. source: did this 3 separate times

[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 7 months ago

Just a quick thanks for including a nonpaywalled link, @ylai@lemmy.ml !

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
711 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59889 readers
2444 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS