[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Keep in mind that when 10nm was in planning, EUV light sources looked very exotic relative to current tech, and even though we can see in hindsight that the tech works it is still expensive to operate -- TSMC's wafer costs increased 2x-3x for EUV nodes. If I was running Intel and my engineers told me that they thought they could extend the runway for DUV lithography for a node or two without sacrificing performance or yields, I'd take that bet in a heartbeat. Continuing to commit resources to 10nm DUV for years after it didn't pan out and competitors moved on to smaller nodes just reeks of sunk-cost fallacy, though.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Intel's problems, IMO, have not been an issue of strategy but of engineering. Trying to do 10nm without EUV was a forgivable error, but refusing to change course when the node failed over and over and over to generate acceptable yield was not, and that willful ceding of process leadership has put them in a hole relative to their competition, and arguably lost them a lucrative sole-source relationship with Apple.

If Intel wants to chart a course that lets them meaningfully outcompete AMD (and everyone else fighting for capacity at TSMC) they need to get their process technology back on track. 18A looks good according to rumors, but it only takes one short-sighted bean counter of a CEO to spin off fabs in favor of outsourcing to TSMC, and once that's out of house it's gone forever. Intel had an engineer-CEO in Gelsinger; they desperately need another, but my fear is that the board will choose to "go another direction" and pick some Welchian MBA ghoul who'll progressively gut the enterprise to show quarterly gains.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 88 points 2 weeks ago

Science: knowledge workers stop being consistently productive past 40 hours per week, and probably less than that

Rentier-capitalists hot boxing their own farts recreationally: ackshually the problem is we let you dirty fucking peasants go home to sleep at all

661

Here's the part where I explain the joke

726
97
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Thrashy@lemmy.world to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world

image caption: a screen capture of a Facebook post consisting of an AI-generated summary of the Wikipedia page about the A-10, and a bad AI image of a fllightline dominated by misproportioned A-10 being serviced exclusively by M4-weilding infantrymen -- including, notably, one that appears to be mounted to a Hoveround.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 95 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I did a little digging and it seems like there's a tiny kernel of fact at the core of this giant turd of a hype-piece, and that is the fact that they electrified this little spur line from Berlin to the new German Tesla factory by using a battery-electric trainset. Which is not a terrible solution for electrifying a very short branch line that presumably doesn't need frequent all-day service, even if it's a bit of a janky approach compared to overhead lines. But hand that off to the overworked, underpaid twenty-two-year old gig worker they've got doing "editing" at Yahoo for two bucks an article, and I guess it turns into "world-first electric wonder train amazes!"

For a second, though, I read the headline and wondered if Musk and co. had finally looped all the way around to reinventing commuter rail from first principles after all these years of trying to "disrupt" it with bullshit ideas like Hyperloop and Tunnels, But Dumber.

790
[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 105 points 3 months ago
[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 96 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I have a friend who had a case before Cannon and told me that she was both one of the stupidest and the meanest judges she's ever dealt with, which is saying something since she practices primarily in Florida. As a representative of the caliber of judges the Federalist Society has to offer, Cannon is pretty damning... and if we get four more years of Trump, the federal bench is going to be stacked with jurists even worse than her.

97
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Thrashy@lemmy.world to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world

EDIT: Realized they're both technically French missiles and that made it even funnier

240
submitted 6 months ago by Thrashy@lemmy.world to c/humor@lemmy.world

Hat tip to Kolanaki, I see I wasn't the only one with this idea.

344
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Thrashy@lemmy.world to c/orphancrushing@lemmy.world
[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 107 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not a coincidence that Texas is a hotbed of development for "microgrid" systems to cover for when ERCOT shits the bed -- and of course all those systems are made up of diesel and natural gas generator farms, because Texans don't want any of that communist solar power!

I've got family in Texas who love it there for some reason, but there's almost no amount of money you could pay me to move there. Bad enough when I have to work on projects in the state -- contrary to the popular narrative, in my personal opinion it's a worse place than California to try and build something, and that's entirely to do with the personalities that seem to gravitate to positions of power there. I'd much rather slog through the bureaucracy in Cali than tiptoe around a tinpot dictator in the planning department.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 96 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They're flying these in very low and slow, which is hard for SAM radars to detect and lock on to unless you're right up next to them -- and once they're past the front lines Russia doesn't have many (if any) point defense installations.

In fact I imagine that the economic impacts of these attacks may be a secondary goal, and the main intent is actually to force Russia to pull SAM systems off the front line and redeploy them across the Russian interior to defend facilities they thought were safely out of Ukraine's reach. The fewer defenses on the front line, the more capable Ukraine's air force is to support efforts on the ground.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 76 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They've got drawbacks, too, especially since most examples of them in residential construction are the efforts of, shall we say, enthusiastic amateurs.

  1. Because soil holds moisture for an extended period of time, they tend to get saturated, and then excess moisture migrates down to the waterproofing system, which will inevitably leak over time. Most amateur-built earth sheltered homes are not using particularly sophisticated waterproofing materials, and rarely take a defense-in-depth approach to them that could mitigate a failure in one layer of the system.
  2. Maintenance is expensive: once any part of the waterproofing fails you are going to have to dig it up to repair it.
  3. Soil - especially wet soil - is heavy and the prescriptive structural parts of residential building code aren't really intended to address this kind of construction. You need an engineer to ensure the house is properly structured for the loads involved, and if you're building new that extra structure is going to cost money and limit design options.
  4. Building into a slope to allow roof access for planting, mowing, etc., limits daylighting options, and particularly in the US where bedrooms are required to have an egress window it can be nearly impossible to design a floorplan with the expected gradient of public to private space.

Don't get me wrong, I love the concept, and I've even drawn up plans for one I'd like to build on the lot next door to me once the nigh-derelict rental house currently occupying the space gets condemned... But this is one case where I absolutely do not want to be buying somebody else's project. I don't trust the other people who build them to do it right.

136
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Thrashy@lemmy.world to c/insanepeoplefacebook@lemmy.world

I know I shouldn't be wasting brain cells on this AI-generated boomer-bait, but I have so many questions:

  • How is the guy in the middle holding that comically-oversized Bible with such a limp-wristed grip? That much onion-skin paper and leather binding must weight like 80 pounds at least. At a minimum I think he'd be tearing the thing in half under its own weight.
  • This looks like it's supposed to be some kind of parade, but you'd think the honor guard would be in dress uniform instead of full tactical gear. Are they protecting the Bible-Bearer from some crazed terrorist hell-bent on a pointless gesture?
  • If so, why all the pomp and circumstance, and why doesn't Heavy Bible Guy get body armor too? Is this an Raiders of the Lost Ark scenario where the Bible has its own supernatural protective powers?
  • If the guy on the right is serving the USA, then what's the guy on the left's "USE" badge mean?
  • If May 2024 is my best year, what will July 2024 be?
[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 141 points 9 months ago
  • No trigger discipline
  • No hands on the wheel
  • Open container of alcoholic beverage
  • Speeding egregiously
  • Driving a Nissan

All checks out.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 75 points 9 months ago

This is called the "Johnson Treatment," ironically.

31
7
submitted 10 months ago by Thrashy@lemmy.world to c/formuladank@lemmy.world
[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 75 points 11 months ago

He's suddenly full of righteous indignation now that he's had a taste of his own medicine. Hypocritical fucknugget.

43

For serious, though, I pointed out after Austin last year that cutting across the entire track at the first turn of the first lap is awful racecraft from Sainz, and got shouted down by Russell-haters.

view more: next ›

Thrashy

joined 1 year ago