627
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

It's almost like Trump tried a coup to avoid leaving office the last time around.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KeefChief13@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Their death won't undo all the harm they did during their life...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They fucking should be

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

That's like saying you're "concerned" water is wet or the sun will rise tomorrow....it's a certainly this scum won't leave, even if he loses again I bet he still tries to take it by force.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Seriously, if that's the only reason they'd vote for Biden instead? W. T. A. F.

Still, if that makes him lose, okay then. But imagine being able to see his threat to democracy, but still feel that there is nothing else about Ronald McDonald that is problematic?

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Might not be the only reason, but it's one of the reasons, and perhaps the most critical.

Of the reasons, this general idea is the most existential threat to our democracy. Everything else, in theory, could be undone in a subsequent election/term. The supreme court appointments are the second most dire, as those can stand for who knows how long.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Hidden? That's literally the main argument when anyone surfaces a complaint about Biden. It's always some variation of, "If we let Trump into the White House again our democracy is over."

The hangup isn't awareness, it's acceptance. People aren't questioning that he'd try to be dictator for life, they doubt his ability to succeed. Once you've seen someone try something and fail it's reasonable to think they're just too incompetent to succeed.

Whenever I see people ask for support for the claim they're typically met with a hail of downvotes and name calling. That may feel righteous but it does absolutely nothing to recruit that person. Instead they'll walk away with even stronger convictions.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why would anyone take that chance? Doesn’t sound like you truly understand the stakes

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Let me give you a small-text infographic about all the things Biden's done so I can shame you into voting for him.

Please don't actually read the list, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Wait why aren't there any hexbearians or MLs here?

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I think a lot of the bigger instances defederated with hexbear. Not sure where the .mls are

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
627 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18601 readers
4305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS