It is narrated by the Kurzgesagt guy, and didn't look AI generated at a glance.
It's also here on youtube from 8 years ago, when this technology was not available for regular folks https://youtu.be/Jy6MwwHpv1s
The yt channel links to https://simpleshow-foundation.org as the website.
Look at the date the file was created:
Date 31 May 2016
Going back to the website then finds zero mention of AI nor was the technology really capable of creating anything like that video (or even parts of it)
https://web.archive.org/web/20160401142946/http://simpleshow.com/us-en/
So, per the comments in this thread, OP is misleading us?
Perhaps not intentionally, super annoying the way they phrased the title though. I guess it makes sense why news media says things like “allegedly” or “possibly”
But they're not the same thing. The headline makes it sound as if Wikipedia is deliberately allowing AI-generated video, when the video in question is years old.
Yeah which I didn’t like as well tbh
I don't see anything there suggesting Wikipedia themselves endorsed this video? Just because someone slips it into an article doesn't mean its allowed.
Would it have been possible for a couple to fuck in space and ground control wouldn't have known about it? 🤔 If no one has fucked in space, the only way we could visualize it is through artificial means. Be it AI or drawn by a human. I'm kinda okay with it for the sex in space article. But not much anywhere else. However: that video is not even AI generated? It's like a JibJab video. 🤨
The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source
We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.
We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.