72
submitted 1 week ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/evs@lemmy.world

Nyobolt, based in Cambridge, has developed a new 35kWh lithium-ion battery that was charged from 10% to 80% in just over four and a half minutes in its first live demonstration last week. [...] Nyobolt's technology builds on a decade of research led by University of Cambridge battery scientist Clare Grey and Cambridge-educated Shivareddy, the company said. Key to its batteries' ability to be charged super-fast without a big impact on their longevity is a design that means they generate less heat. It also makes them safer as overheating can cause a lithium-ion battery to catch fire and explode. In addition, the materials used to make the batteries' anodes allow for a faster transfer of electrons. Nyobolt is currently in talks to sell its batteries to eight electric car manufacturers. At 35 kWh, the battery is much smaller than the 85 kWh in a more typical American electric vehicle (EV). Yet the technology may be used in larger battery packs in the future.

Independent testing of Nyobolt's batteries by what it called a leading global manufacturer found that they can achieve over 4,000 fast-charge cycles, equivalent to 600,000 miles (965,600 kilometers), while retaining more than 80% of capacity, Nyobolt said in its Friday statement. William Kephart, an e-mobility specialist at consultancy P3 Group and a former engineer, said EV batteries of the kind Nyobolt has developed could "theoretically" be charged as fast as the firm is promising, but the challenge was manufacturing such batteries on an industrial scale. A crucial chemical element in Nyobolt's batteries is niobium but, as Kephart pointed out, last year only an estimated 83,000 tons (94,500 tons) was mined worldwide. Compare that with graphite, commonly used as anode material in lithium-ion batteries: an estimated 1.6 million tons (1.8 million tons) was produced in 2023. In addition, there are currently "a lot of unknowns" with the niobium battery technology, he told CNN. "The industry will work it out (but) it's not seen by the industry as a scalable technology just yet," he added.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Can we stop posting cnn articles

[-] Delta_V@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

On paper, they look comparable to Tesla batteries. These new batteries are about half the size of Tesla's, and the test was performed with a charging station that delivered more than twice the power of a typical Supercharger station. Try charging two of them at the speed our current charging infrastructure will support and it'll take about 20 minutes.

What seems to be new and improved is that these batteries can apparently accept more energy from a charging station without overheating, and the rate at which they permanently lose maximum capacity from Level 3 charging is reduced.

I wonder how heavy they are compared to the competition?

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It doesn't seem like a Tesla battery at all to me. It uses a rare material that can't be scaled to industrial levels with the current mining yields, and it charges far faster. It's a completely new type of battery that will probably undergo many changes before it ever hits the market, but it's a remarkable discovery.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 1 points 1 week ago

I wonder how heavy they are compared to the competition?

You mean the kw charging cable?

[-] Zucca@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

So...

70% of 35kWh ➡️ 35kWh*0.7 = 24.5kWh
24.5*(60/4.5) ~ 326kW of charging power

Not bad. I mean realistically, on average, you'd get maybe close to 150kW charging. That's still not bad.

To charge at that rate, you'd probably want more than 326kW at the beginning, and less at the end. An empty battery changes faster than a nearly full one.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I like using the bathtub as a comparison for batteries. Fill it as fast as you want at first but you can't let it overflow. As you get closer to the top you have to slow down more and more. At closer to 80 percent you should be charging at closer to 20 percent or less of the rate you did at the start. As you crest 80 percent the chasing rare should almost plummet.

Edit: As you crest 80 percent the charging rate should almost plummet.

I hate it when my chasing rare plummets

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you I fixed it.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Cool! But specific energy (g/wh) and cost are always important metrics for adoption. Do they have any info on those?

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
72 points (96.2% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2930 readers
7 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS