Sure, that's off.
She's 15. Take the value out of the article.
Sure, that's off.
She's 15. Take the value out of the article.
You really saved us all with your... not voting?
If he doesn't like Trump then he probably
Trying to define Jewishness by what Israel and/or Epstein does is antisemitic.
It's an analogy about the same problem. By providing content in a space where they're posting, we're helping to spread tankie bullshit.
It's the same reason the middle east is trying to buy up all the sports and esports, to help sanewash their bullshit.
Blocking them isn't enough. It's the racist joke problem.
You might think your racist joke is just a joke and really you don't mean it and you're not actually that racist. Unfortunately, your joke is also helping to provide a space and acceptance for actual racists and teaching others that culture is acceptable.
Just by being here we're providing the content that gives them a platform. Defederation helps somewhat. Blocking really doesn't.
charging Dingus with voyeurism
Ohio Revised Code Section 2907.08 | Voyeurism
(A) No person, for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying the person's self, shall commit trespass or otherwise surreptitiously invade the privacy of another, to spy or eavesdrop upon another.
(2) A violation of division (A) of this section is a misdemeanor of the third degree.
It doesn't? I think it does have that risk.
His value was in listening to the smart people in the room and not giving a fuck about red tape, clearing the way for those smart people.
Those smart people have been replaced by right wing grifters and even more ketamine.
He did have some value. Even if he didn't invent them, I don't think electric cars get to where they are today without his help. And now they wouldn't have begun to decline without his help.
I thought they did pay those back.
I'd expect there needs to be actual damages first. So you have to say no and then get fired, and then you have a case.
Though if it's heading that way, a lawyer may want to help you prep to seal the case as it's being made.
It's not that it's a new concept. It's that boys definitely are referred to as "males". In years past it was probably more common than hearing "females", though recent trends (incels) have likely changed that. It's a nitpick that stuck out to me also, but it's a small point from a more important larger point being made by a 15 year old. Maybe someone should have caught that in editing, but it shouldn't be a big deal. And we can afford to give the kid that much leeway.