192
submitted 3 days ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

"Oh, you lied and fucked up? If you pay us some money, we'll look the other way 😉"

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 days ago

A settlement. That'll really put the emissions back in the ground

[-] potate@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 days ago

Fines clearly don't work. We need criminal penalties.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

They don't work because they are super low.

If the fines cost more than what companies gain from cheating, they will be a lot less inclined to cheat.

But in this case, this is a joke fine.

[-] LovesTha@floss.social 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

@mondoman712 $24 per vehicle?

That is a joke.

Fines can work, when people expect the fines to actually hurt.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Fines are only a punishment for the poor.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

From the streetcar conspiracy to this. GM sure has an illustrious history.

[-] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

6 million cars, the fine is $140 million. That's $24 or so per car. There's no way that GM saved only $24/car doing this. So the fine is just a cost of doing business.

EDIT:

The company has also voluntarily retired about 50 million tons of carbon dioxide pollution credits, which are issued by the E.P.A. and used by auto companies to make it easier to comply with increasingly stringent federal tailpipe emissions standards. G.M. estimates the value of the loss of the credits at about $300 million, reflecting what it paid for them a decade or so ago. However, the market value of those carbon credits varies, and a more recent government estimate of $86 per credit would put the value at about $4.6 billion.

This is probably where the actual sting to them is.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

People shit on CA smog tests but if every state had them, this wouldn't be as much of an issue and the states would generate more revenue.

[-] RiikkaTheIcePrincess@pawb.social 13 points 3 days ago

That's how many major car companies caught bullshitting emissions requirements now? It's almost as if there's some kind of underlying thing driving (pun unintended but welcome ;3 Call it comic relief if you like) capitalist entities toward awful behaviour.

[-] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

An invisible hand made me do it!

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Fuck SUVs in particular.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And thanks to the overturning of Chevron, the EPA is unable to do anything.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Quite honestly, which auto company hasn't cheated emissions testing?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 3 days ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Biden administration reached a settlement with General Motors after determining that the automaker sold nearly six million cars that emitted more planet-warming carbon dioxide than the company had claimed, violating federal regulations.

will pay more than $145.8 million in penalties for selling vehicles between model years 2012 and 2018 that were required to comply with Obama-era auto tailpipe emissions standards designed to reduce planet-warming pollution.

“Our investigation has achieved accountability and upholds an important program that’s reducing air pollution and protecting communities across the country.”

GM remains committed to reducing auto emissions and working toward achieving the Administration’s fleet electrification goals,” the statement said.

Once fully implemented, the new rules are designed to ensure that the majority of new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States are all-electric or hybrids by 2032, up from less than 10 percent last year.

The loss of G.M.’s carbon dioxide pollution credits in the settlement could make it more difficult or expensive for the company to comply with those new rules.


The original article contains 554 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago
[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

How do you emit excess CO2? Like I can imagine if it isn’t burning clean and shitting out CO or particulates or something, but wouldn’t “excess CO2” just mean they’re just inefficient?

Do they not meet their mileage ratings?

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They had standard to meet that a vehicle of a certain weight/class must not exceed certain amount of emissions. They made vehicles that didn't meet that standard, shrugged and put them to market anyway because they knew the profits would outweigh any "punishment" fron the spineless regulatory bodies.

The whoe CAFE standards and the shift in car sizes associated with them should be enough evidence to prove the EPA has failed and become disconnected from its true purposes

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah I get that. I think it’s just odd to phrase it as emitting too much CO2, and not getting poor mileage.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
192 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9481 readers
447 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS