739
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I just distribute it as a self-contained executable/archive. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Valid solution, but I miss unified updates with appimages and such

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 7 points 1 month ago

As long as your application is statically linked, I don't see any issue with that.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

So, like, dumb question. People here assumed that I mean AppImages, whereas I actually meant just a statically linked binary. Is that really the only reason why AppImage exists? So, that dynamically linked applications can be distributed like statically linked ones?

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 9 points 1 month ago

You cannot statically link everything. Take graphics libraries and APIs for example, do you statically link against nvidia's or mesa's opengl?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 6 points 1 month ago

The majority of AppImages I've seen have been dynamically linked, yes. But it's also used for packaging assets.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Nix: you package it yourself and do a pull request

Sadly, many flatpaks don't even work on NixOS properly because of assumptions about the file structure or similar

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
739 points (93.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20351 readers
999 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS