4

Title. I’ve heard some say it is because the storyline is incoherent compared to the prior two movies.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

It was a world building movie. It showed more of the world’s decline and what was left in it. It was the issues of a comic book between the 6 issue story arcs. Beyond this, I cannot give you a solid yes or no.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I'm amazed that this C/ exists.

But, no. It was perfect at the time. It built on that world in a very interesting way, despite the flaws. Incoherent would be grossly inaccurate. Could it use better editing? Absolutely. But the story is there, you can follow it without difficulty.

I loved it as much or more than the first movie tbh, flaws and all.

Plus, c'mon, Tina Turner? How can you hate that?

[-] clark@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

I'm amazed that this C/ exists.

Currently fixating on MM and felt I needed to make a sub. Especially considering lots of people have already watched Furiosa and likely have opinions on it (psst, I made a post about that).

[-] androogee@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Have you ever considered going through the rest of George Miller's filmography?

I did it recently (following along with a podcast that was doing the same). It's a weird and fascinating journey haha.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Nothing wrong with that :)

[-] androogee@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The first half is great. The second half is pretty rough tho.

¯\(ツ)

Doctor Miller is a mystery

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Everything Mad Max

40 readers
1 users here now

Everything Mad Max – novels, films, comics, head-canons, essays and video essays. Including “Furiosa.”

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS