47

Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip 6 has arrived, and despite costing $100 more, it feels like an incredibly iterative update.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 1 month ago

I seriously considered this. I love the form factor. then I saw the price. problem is while I like the form factor im not really willing to pay much more for it. So it needs to be like less than 100 more than phones with similar hardware levels. I also hate the way they put screens on the outside. I want to be able to flip it closed and for it to not be active or glow or interact in any way at that point. that to me is the point of being able to flip closed.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have a 5. Now that the new Razr+ is out, and they seem to have addressed most of the previous issues, that's the one I'll be looking at next.

Why? Samsung software. It's pervasive and hard to remove, or even often just to disable. And Samsung collects all of the data. It's crazy how much is shipped back to Samsung servers.

If you don't care about that kind of thing, the hardware is nice. But I'm looking elsewhere for my next flip phone.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Is Motorola any better? I kinda assume they're all doing that at this point. Because why wouldn't they?

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Motorola's software is a lot less intrusive. Off the top of my head there is not a single important feature I can think of which is locked behind a Motorola account (though I am yet to get the Android 14 and Hello UI update, so I'm not sure if that changed things), whereas Samsung forces you to create and login to a Samsung account to access many of the features which make One UI so customisable. You can disable/uninstall/not create an account to minimise data leakage but then you're missing out on some of the stuff which makes Samsung phones particularly good (like Good Lock).

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Wooooow that is obnoxious but unsurprising.

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It would be nice if the exterior display was just like an e ink one that showed a clock and notifications like the little lcds on old flip phone lids

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 1 month ago

or maybe jave a slide closure or something.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago

The Fold is just $100 shy of two thousand dollars...

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Ya fuck that, especially on experimental technology. No way that thing will last, for twice the price of a regular phone.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

I dunno about you but that's 4x as much as I've ever spent on a phone.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

1200 for me and that felt rough. I used to do the 700$ phones. I miss those days. But I keep my phones for 4-6 years usually and if you amortize it, it's not that bad in the end, I use it every single day extensively.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago

I miss the days when flagship phones like the LG G4 were $400 🤣

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I remember my Nexus one and Galaxy Nexus. They know they can get away with high margins so they will.

[-] ag10n@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Still no Dex, makes no sense when the SoC and hardware are more than capable.

[-] evo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It makes sense when you factor in the development and maintenance cost. How many people have a desk with monitors, keyboard and mouse but don't already have a more powerful machine they use there?It's a high price to pay for the 1% of users that will ever try it.

[-] ag10n@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They already implement Dex on their high-end phones, let alone their A-Series.

Why support and test and promote something for your mid-tier and then decide not to do it for this one premium model.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone -1 points 1 month ago

Presumably they have determined that the cost is not worth it, given the demographics of their customers. The Z-Flip seems to be pretty clearly targeted at young women - would they actually use a desktop mode in their smartphone?

[-] ag10n@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Would love to see that research that says women wouldn’t want a compact desktop enabled phone. Again, seems arbitrary when the majority of their S-Series since the S8 supports it

[-] ByteMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And wifi 6e instead of 7, despite ultra having the same soc + has 7

[-] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I recently had to replace my phone and just needed something working. Not even a fan of Samsung but I bought a Z Flip 4 for like $300 and it has like a scratch or two on the screen I barely notice. It's been fantastic and I see no reason to really get a 5 or 6...

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)

Android

17163 readers
674 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS