112

Political ads on social media rife with misinformation and scams, new research finds (apnews.com)

submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The online advertisement to Donald Trump supporters was clear enough: Click here, and receive a free Trump 2024 flag and a commemorative coin. All in exchange for taking a quick survey and providing a credit card number for the $5 shipping and handling.

“You’ll get two free gifts just by taking this quick poll in support of Trump,” says the ad’s narrator.

The ad — which has appeared on Facebook, YouTube and other platforms — didn’t mention the $80 charge that would later appear on credit card statements. Those that clicked were scammed.

Political advertisements on social media are one of the best ways for candidates to reach supporters and raise campaign cash. But as a new report from Syracuse University shows, weak regulations governing online ads and haphazard enforcement by tech companies also make ads a prime source for misleading information about elections — and a tantalizingly easy way for con artists to target victims.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

~~Political ads on social media~~ The Internet rife with misinformation and scams, new research finds.

FTFY

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure old research found the same thing!

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Patrick Stewart demonstrating mild shock

Why would tech companies or politicians derail that gravy train? I mean, they should for many, many reasons, , but why would they?

Tech companies rake in the ad dollars and the politicians rake in the rube dollars.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Many of the pages sold Trump-related merchandise such as flags, hats, banners and coins or advertised fictitious investment schemes. The true motive, apparently, was to get a user’s credit card information.

Aren’t the self-interested, amoral Trump voters at least embarrassed that their side is made up primarily of rubes?

What am I saying, that’s like asking if sharks are embarrassed to be seen around a bunch of reef fish.

[-] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Hmm, the internet? Rife with misinformation and scams, you say?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

“There is very little regulation on the platforms,” said Jennifer Stromer-Galley, the professor who led the research for the ElectionGraph Project at Syracuse University’s Institute for Democracy, Journalism & Citizenship.

Stromer’s research examined more than 2,200 groups on Facebook or Instagram that ran ads between September and May mentioning one of the presidential candidates.

Many of the ads contained misleading information, or deepfake video and audio of celebrities supposedly crying during a speech by former First Lady Melania Trump.

Using a partnership with the data science firm Neo4j, Stromer-Galley found that some of the pages shared common creators, or ran virtually identical ads.

Many of the pages sold Trump-related merchandise such as flags, hats, banners and coins or advertised fictitious investment schemes.

In addition, the company urges its users not to click on suspicious links, or to hand over personal information to untrustworthy sources.

The original article contains 669 words, the summary contains 144 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024

112 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18601 readers

5086 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News