Women on instagram : funny

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

"They're super comfortable"

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

[-] ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I think that pose is called the swallow

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Swallow, come!

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

No one disturb him, he's been doing yoga for years preparing for this moment.

[-] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago

They are pretty cool pants.

[-] grysbok 17 points 1 month ago

Legit. I like how the texture looks like a function of the fabric, not a printed-on pattern. Plus the stitching looks solid.

[-] mkhopper@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

"I could never reach."
"Reach what?"
"You know...."
"What, your clit??"
"Yeah, it's like you said, 'everyone gets curious and tries it some time.'"
"I never tried it."
" ......."
" Fuckin' pervert.. "

(I know that's not the actual line, but the change fits the photo)

[-] TheHottub@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From the corner of my eye, I thought this was going to be a picture of The Deep.

Edit: spelling hehe

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It is

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Your I?

[-] TheHottub@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Oops. Fixed

[-] levzzz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Nanomachines?

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

being blocked by instagram because I don't facebook is such a great co-mingling.

[+] Jackie_meaiii@lemmy.blahaj.zone -10 points 1 month ago

The joke is mysoginy

[-] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

It's not just women on social media though, that's just a reflection of this OPs algorithm. A thirst trap is a thirst trap, don't matter the gender.

[-] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

"A thirst trap is a thirst trap, don't matter the gender." - Garbagebagel, 2024

Wiser words have never been spoken.

[+] atro_city@fedia.io -42 points 1 month ago

"DoN'T obJeCtiFy Us!"

[-] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 21 points 1 month ago

Yeah, maybe don't.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

*objectifies self*

Don't objectify me!

[-] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 6 points 1 month ago

Yes, exactly. You're getting there.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Cognitive dissonance must be respected.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

Different women be saying different things.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Yeah it's almost like they're individuals. Who'da thunk it.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io -4 points 1 month ago

And some be saying exactly this while exposing themself like that. Did you think I was talking about all women?

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now say "but not all men" in a man-hater post! Double standards, yay!

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

Wat?

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

In my mind, it is significantly more likely that someone on the internet is a misogynist rather than them talking about the miniscule overlap between women not wanting to be objectified and women posing in manners that commonly get objectified. In the latter case, I would also expect that someone to be aware of the prevalence of misogynists and therefore distance themselves from them, so as to not be misunderstood. The downvotes you got seem to agree with me.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

and "my prejudice is justified" but at the same time "not all women".

Steadfast principles, I see.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Congratulations on technically not being wrong, I guess? I was admitting that, yeah, I made certain assumptions there. At the same time, I tried to provide you feedback that your communication attempt was evidently not successful. But rather than reflecting on that, you're completely blocking that off. Rather than communicating, you're just looking to prove that I'm a dumbass and you're not. Was that first comment intentionally ambiguous, so you could prove you're technically not wrong? Is that your thought of a good time? Because fucking hell, it is not for me.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

This is my unfriendly account, where I don't take the time to put breadcrumbs for people towards the path of realizing "all men are X but not all women are Y" is a double standard.

I don't think you're a dumbass. My comments were on your principles, not your intelligence.

[-] leds@feddit.dk 1 points 1 month ago

Why do you think that is exposing? What is that exposing and why do you think that is a problem?

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why do you think that is exposing?

Because the dictionary does.

to present to view; exhibit; display:

The storekeeper exposed his wares.

Next question

What is that exposing?

And some be saying exactly this while exposing themself like that.

Did you even read what I wrote? It's really not that much.

why do you think that is a problem?

Where did I say it was a problem? Quote the exact part of my response where I say it's a problem.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It was not clear.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago

Sure bro, because women share a hive mind.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io -1 points 1 month ago

Funny, I never said all women think like this, but somehow you did. Good projection

[-] Shou@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

It's impressive really. I thought men compartmentalized better, but here we see yet another internet stranger incapable of seperating something into "women choosing to" and "women choosing not to."

Funny: Home of the Haha

Our Rules: