539
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by solsangraal@lemmy.zip to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago
[-] broton33@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Good for America.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

you fucking morons

You don't need to restore Roe.

You need an actual law enshrining it as a right.

I'm not a judge, but I can definitely see why Roe was overturned. So don't play stupid games, don't rely on a Court to interpret a certain Law a certain way, just enshrine it in law. Black ink on white paper.

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh of course, we'll just go ahead and do that tomorrow! Sheesh, what were we thinking? Thank you so much for your enlightening remarks. It was so obvious this entire time!

[-] lath@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Rather just restore, improve. It was said Roe is incomplete and should be revisited for better and clearer coverage.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Politico Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Politico is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politico/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
- https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2024%2F07%2F29%2Fkamala-harris-abortion-restoring-roe-00171657


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 month ago

Don't restore it, make a better law and make it a human right.

[-] LibreHans@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

How would "restoring" work? Is that legislation, or modifying the supreme court, etc?

[-] JuBe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Basically legislation. Dobbs just said there wasn’t a constitutional right, but that doesn’t mean there can’t be a federal law that makes that a right. A federal law could effectively restore this right (although it wouldn’t make it a constitutional right, which would be harder to take away).

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
539 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18821 readers
4696 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS