11
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by solo@slrpnk.net to c/tidalpunk@slrpnk.net
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

Thanks for sharing! I think there's a perception that carbon capture is mostly trees, but it's so interesting how complex everything actually is.

I only found out about the Ocean Carbon Pump a year ago, which is a pretty big deal for carbon capture: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_pump

[-] dgkf@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Just one small correction, which is in the article but somehow is wrong in the title.

Rainfall increases the ocean’s uptake of carbon by 6%, and the ocean accounts for one quarter of global uptake. So the amount we’re talking about here is 1.5% and doesn’t include the amount rainfall contributes to uptake of carbon on land unless we just chalk all rainfall up to oceanic uptake.

[-] solo@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

Great you mentioned this, so I just edited the title so the point is clear.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
11 points (92.3% liked)

Ocean Conservation & Tidalpunk

438 readers
28 users here now

A community to discuss news about our oceans & seas, marine conservation, sustainable aquatic tech, and anything related to Tidalpunk - the ocean-centric subgenre of Solarpunk.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS