-64

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/VrHnx

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] echo@lemmings.world 16 points 2 months ago

Intelligent people are supposed to change their stances on things when faced with new information. Good on her for having a brain and using it!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Would you rather have someone who can be moved to change their opinion or someone who is apparently proud that they're the same person they were in first grade?

https://theweek.com/speedreads/575962/donald-trump-tells-biographer-hes-same-now-first-grade

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Do centrists have an argument that doesn't involve immediately dismissing anyone to their left as a Trump supporter?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Not in America where those are the only 2 choices, no.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So to be clear, you're calling anyone who has any criticism at all of Harris of being a Trump supporter?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

No, I'm saying the winner of the election will either be Harris or Trump. You pick one or have the pick made for you.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The article is about Harris, who I am voting for on October 21, which is the day early voting opens in Texas. Your initial comment is predicated on the assumption that criticism of Harris maps 1:1 with trump support.

My two cents: Harris changing her opinions seem to match her trying to grasp what the majority of the public wants.

This is a good thing as Harris then isn't being wishy-washy for no reason, but she is evolving her views to match the electorate.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

LA Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for LA Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-10-10/2024-election-kamala-harris-policy-shifts
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

She's a Democrat. You didn't honestly expect her to move leftward, did you?

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

Her opposition is setting the bar low.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

That doesn't mean we have to keep trying to limbo under it.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Basically took every major platform point from Joe Biden and moved it right...

Because the DMC thinks thatbsince she's not a walking corpse, voters will hold their nose for shittier policy.

The goal of the DMC is to give voters just enough that they could win, instead, we could give voters the platform they want and just always win

But campaigns wouldn't cost over a billion dollars then

Basically took every major platform point from Joe Biden and moved it right…

Sadly makes sense. In 2019 she was trying to distinguish herself from other Dems in a primary. In 2024 she's trying to win over moderate Republicans.

voters will hold their nose for shittier policy.

Because of course we need the moderate Republican vote to win, and even a rightward Harris is better than the other option. The idea is that Harris wins the next two elections, and good chance the other guy won't be able to run when he's in his 90s. So democracy saved, and then we go back to elections-as-usual.

But campaigns wouldn’t cost over a billion dollars then

I agree this is bad, but blame Citizens United (2010).

The goal of the DMC is to give voters just enough that they could win,

Leftie voters, that is.

instead, we could give voters the platform they want and just always win

Well, that's what they're trying to do indeed. But the coalition is too broad with too many disagreements, so not everyone can get everything they want. Your way could well cost Harris the election.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

She did that two years ago, she cast the tie breaking vote against a fracking ban.

It's not just a couple moves thinking it'll help her win the election, it's been a steady and sustained change. Obama did it too, but he started a lot further left than Kamala.

She did that two years ago, she cast the tie breaking vote against a fracking ban.

Yeah, then the courts came in and prevented then from stopping fracking, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/28/climate/biden-drilling-leases.html

It’s not just a couple moves thinking it’ll help her win the election, it’s been a steady and sustained change.
Obama did it too, but he started a lot further left than Kamala.

The fact that they did it shows just how well they understand that they need the center to win. This is unfortunate, but, can't be helped.

Anyways, the time to deal with this is post-election, where we win over the hearts and minds of the rural and midwestern US to evolve a new position to end fracking nationwide.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
-64 points (13.6% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2104 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS