792
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/news@lemmy.world

More than 100 Arizona Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and progressive Democrats and community leaders have signed a letter making the case for those reluctant to support Kamala Harris against Donald Trump.

“We know that many in our communities are resistant to vote for Kamala Harris because of the Biden administration’s complicity in the genocide,” the letter, published Thursday night, reads.

“Some of us have lost many family members in Gaza and Lebanon. We respect those who feel they simply can’t vote for a member of the administration that sent the bombs that may have killed their loved ones,” the letter continued. “As we consider the full situation carefully, however, we conclude that voting for Kamala Harris is the best option for the Palestinian cause and all of our communities.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] derf82@lemmy.world 120 points 18 hours ago

Do Muslim’s really think voting for Muslim ban guy who would give Israel even more weapons a better choice?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 32 points 17 hours ago

Many just want to stay home, but in contested districts their absence may mean something.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Many are extremely conservative, and just want a tax cut.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

The tax cut that Turnip would only give to the 1%?

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Lot are well off, and the rest think they'll get it anyway.

Remember, the Trump tax cuts were popular-ish even when most people got like $100/yr.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 117 points 19 hours ago

That is fucking brutal.

I agree but man what a horrible choice.

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

Every election in the US is that way. It's a choice of the lesser evil and you can only vote against the greater evil not vote for good.

[-] Shark_Ra_Thanos@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 hours ago

IA! Fthagn!

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 47 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

yeah its a truly dystopian choice but voting for somebody doesn't mean you approve of everything they have done or will do.

It just means for those with affected friends and families they have done the cruel calculus and have decided which path will be lesser of two evils.

I fully expect trump to try to deport palestinian refugees and its crazy this is where we are at.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago

I mean, he's promised to deport Americans who protest on behalf of the Palestinians. He sure wouldn't hesitate to deport Palestinian refugees.

[-] Souroak 25 points 14 hours ago

It is no choice between someone who disappoints me in their responses on this issue, and someone who openly wonders if sending a nuclear warhead into a hurricane a couple hundred miles offshore will lead to a positive result. And of course that was with where his mental state was at over 4 years ago.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 14 hours ago

Well said!!

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 47 points 19 hours ago

Man, I hope this changes some minds, but it might be too little too late. She's had a lot of opportunities to turn things around with the Arab community, and she's flat out ignored all of them. I'm really worried this will be her version of Hillary's, "I don't need to campaign in the Rust Belt," decision.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 22 points 17 hours ago

It's a major complication / fault with running a candidate who is in office already. They cannot deviate from the official position, tone, language, admission of guilt, etc.

I'm not saying I have secret info and Harris would 180 on Israel if she won, just saying she can't even build breathing room from Biden while being the sitting vp.

This is not an excuse for the administration's stance, just a reflection on the challenges of running while in office.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, when she first started running, I figured she was trying not to undermine Biden's ceasefire negotiations, but I assumed she would find some way to reach out to the Arab communities she needs for Michigan and Wisconsin. Now It's the 11th hour, and she hasn't done anything. I just don't understand why they're completely ignoring this demographic.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 15 points 17 hours ago

She's had a lot of opportunities to turn things around with the Arab community, and

You DO realize that she can't campaign on that, right?

I know it's a little subtle for an American political scene that no longer uses such terms as waffler and carpet-bagger, but these used to be campaign-wrecking slurs.

She'd be labeled a waffler in seconds. And not only would we like her to change her position, but so would the gqp for the political damage. She can't change until she's achieved a 4-year contract.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

No one is saying she has to do a 180 on Gaza, but she could have let a Palestinian speak at the DNC, or met with the Uncommitted leadership last month. It would take very little effort to make herself look more appealing to Arab Americans than Biden and Trump, but she just didn't do it.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

It's the lawyer effect, they overanalyze everything and make "safe" bets. Trump is going out there and waving his bare ass around while the Dems sit above wringing their hands about what each micro group might think. They're too worried about stroking "group leaders" egos than actually addressing real people's needs.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 193 points 22 hours ago

It is important to note that foreign nations like Iran, Russia and China are using this topic to convince voters to allow facism to win the election in the US. This doesn’t mean that Israel shouldn’t be held accountable for their actions. But history shows how foreign actors use these topics to manipulate us.

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 22 hours ago

I think it is important to note that a surprisingly large number of voters say they like fascism without any need to rationalise that as foreign meddling. Being told that you are good because you are ingroup and they are bad because they are outgroup is an enduringly popular message with a large minority of people.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 14 hours ago

Looks like teaching history was important after all...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (83 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 76 points 21 hours ago

Some of us have lost many family members in Gaza and Lebanon.

Watch the "a vote for Kamala is a vote for genocide" crowd claim these Palestinian and Lebanese Americans support genocide in Palestine and Lebanon.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 85 points 23 hours ago

Wow, this milkshake brings all the .ml to the yard.l

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
792 points (96.4% liked)

News

23252 readers
3381 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS