89
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 4 days ago

Arch really does have the most straightforward packaging system. Can you write a Bash script? Cool. You can package your application for Arch very easily.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately, from my testing back when I used Arch, a lot of packages in the AUR didn't meet packaging guidelines, so while quickly writing a PKGBUILD is easy, writing it correctly requires a bit more effort, especially regarding the dependencies. IIRC namcap is often enough, but ideally packages should be built in clean chroots as well to make sure they build everywhere

[-] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

Yeah, while lots of people have plenty of other reasons for using Arch. The packaging system is my personal favorite. I have made packages for deb and rpm based systems before, but Arch is just so dead simple with little scripts preinstalled to make it even easier.

[-] Classy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Absolutely agree, the wholeapt-get upgrade (or however, I always messed it up!) was annoying to me, and I switched to an arch distro (Endeavour) and I'm super happy with it. It's my only machine and it is awesome

[-] DoeJohn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You don't need to type apt-get, you can just do apt upgrade.

[-] Lem453@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Can AUR be used by other distros like Debian or fedora?

[-] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Technically yes, but practically no. For the same reasons that manjaro might struggle with the aur even though it is technically arch based.

[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Unfortunately, no, but you can get kind of close for Debian distros with LURE.

EDIT: Apparently LURE is supposed to be distro-agnostic, so it'd probably work for EL too.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 days ago

Don't the file structure guidelines differ across distros?

[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah. I haven't looked at the code that closely, but it looks like they account for various differences between distros.

[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago
[-] jlow@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Lol, the hardcoded linebrakes, haven't seen that for a while, what a glorious mess.

[-] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 3 points 4 days ago

David might be using git's send email, which he likely has set up to have a max line length of about 80, because that's what the kernel developers require.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That's typical for plain-text email which this is.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago

Is it? What email client can't do any kind of soft word-wrapping?

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Soft wrapping plain-text is surprisingly hard to get right. It's better to just hard wrap your text when writing an email. Any half-decent text editor/mail client has a feature to automatically hard-wrap a paragraph for you for convenience.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
89 points (96.8% liked)

Linux

48590 readers
598 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS