394
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Trump’s team is considering abolishing key banking regulators, including the FDIC and OCC, with plans to consolidate their functions under the Treasury Department.

Critics warn this could undermine public trust in banking, weaken deposit insurance protections, and risk another financial crisis.

The FDIC, established during the Great Depression, played a crucial role in managing the 2023 banking crisis.

Trump allies, backed by financial industry donors, are also targeting other consumer protections, reflecting sweeping deregulatory ambitions tied to Project 2025’s proposals.

Experts fear these moves could destabilize the economy.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Didn't a whole silicon valley bank just wipe out its customers savings by not being fdic insured

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

That's not a recession. That's a depression

[-] inkrifle@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago

Wasn't lack of regulation what caused the 2008 recession?

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 day ago

And supply-side-God willing, we can get back to there.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 1 day ago

Look, some of us are going to make the sacrifice to supply-side-God. We gotta do everything to help the rich get richer. Cause fuck us plebs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago
[-] The_v@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago

The 2020's are looking to end like the 1920's.

Not a recession, but a massive depression.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

massive depression

Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ahead of the curve on this one.

[-] save_the_humans@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago

You and me both, bud.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Except, considering how globalized the world economy is today, it would cause a complete total economic collapse on a global scale. You thought the great depression in the 1920s was bad? You have no idea how bad it can really get.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

The 1920s depression was infamously global.

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not just economic globalization, but the global ecosystem's food chains are already starting to collapse thanks to climate change, and our factory farming systems are becoming increasingly prone to virulent diseases wiping out huge crops of both plants and animals. I wonder what happens when food prices skyrocket because half our food supply has been contaminated, and at the same time inflation explodes thanks to plain ol' financial mismanagement

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

It's gonna be baaaaad.

[-] Heikki@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago

Trump (2 weeks after everything all the experts said would happen happens): Noun one knew how complicated banking is... my uncle, the MIT professor; huege brain was surprised this happened. An MIT professor didn't think this could happen; speaking of things that happen, Batron... where is Batron? Where is, possibly, my "favorite" son? The crypto visionary. Let me tell you about the importance of crypto. Did you know this stuff is mined? Like from the earth? More valuable than water it is. Looking to back the usd by crypto and then by water. It's free it just drops from the sky like "Bing, Bing Bing bing" might as well as be kaching!!

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I fucking hate that what you wrote could be credibly said by him. I mean except how eloquently you put it lol

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago

Not gonna lie. If the FDIC goes, I withdraw immediately.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

If it looks like it's on its way out soon I put a run on that bank like it's dollar store pantihose

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

And do what? It's literally not possible to live without a bank account any more. They've actively destroyed cash as a means of payment

[-] Gigasser@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

What? Cash still works man, and probably will still work. They just made non-cash ways of spending money more convenient, which is why so many aren't using cash anymore, but it won't go anytime soon.

Or are you talking about something else I'm not thinking of?

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To pay my rent I would have to take my paycheck physically to a bank, cash my check, use that cash to buy multiple money orders, and then mail those money orders. Keep in mind this has to be done early enough to be delivered before the 1st and that the bank is mostly open when I'm at work.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

They don't care if they tank the dollar, it will make the assets in the Strategic Dogecoin Reserve that much more valuable.

[-] rishado@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure the plan is to actively tank the dollar

The question is, how do you bet against the US Economy and for whatever selfish fuckhead of a plan they have.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago

Probably crypto, unfortunately.

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

As the person said below, move your currency out of the US dollar into something like gold or buy a house with a 30-year mortgage because you are basically shorting the dollar for a hard, tangible asset.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

This assumes that you will have an income of something worth more than the US dollar to pay the mortgage with. If your income continues at the same amount of US$ then your mortgage payment will still cost you the same amount of income, regardless of how the global valuation of the US$ changes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rishado@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Well look, I'm not advocating for this coming government nor am I an economic expert. But in a vacuum one could impose tariffs on imported goods, tank the cost of labor in your own country, and force manufacturing back here, right? And in the long run, would be beneficial for local manufacturing instead of being so dependent on China. If it weren't for the local oligarchy here I'd say it's even a tough but fair plan for the economy. Knowing what we know, things will only get harder with no observable benefit for the working class as whatever improvement we manage to make will be sucked away by the ruling class. But the plan isn't horseshit in a vacuum. Someone please feel free to tell me why I'm completely wrong as I'm not really speaking with too much conviction tbh

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 21 hours ago

I believe this is what Milei is selling in Argentina. I believe your assessment is correct. They're telling us that it will be hard in the short term, but it will be worth it in the long term. The thing is, they mean worth it for the owner class. Working class people will take the brunt of it and it will just stay awful.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

And in the long run, would be beneficial for local manufacturing instead of being so dependent on China....Knowing what we know, things will only get harder with no observable benefit for the working class

...and...

Someone please feel free to tell me why I’m completely wrong as I’m not really speaking with too much conviction tbh

Those tariffs would destroy our $1.95 trillion in exports from the USA because many of those are finished goods with input materials imported (and now tariffed to high heaven). source

Modern manufacturing doesn't depend on hundreds of thousands of human bodies anymore. New manufacturing factories would be highly automated and only employ a tiny fraction of the now unemployed workforce to produce the same amount of goods as in years past.

"From 1960 to today, American steel mills have decreased from an average of 700,000 workers to just 83,000. And within the last 40 years, the productivity of labor has increased more than five times from approximately 10 man-hours per finished ton to under 2." source

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

So we're basically forfeiting a bunch of jobs related to and effected by procuring overseas input materials to gain a small fraction of manufacturing jobs? That just sounds like it will damage the economy and not bring it back up.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Exactly why everyone with a brain has been shouting that this is the worst possible idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

In my home country (we all know the economy is gonna keep getting worse so we bet against it by default) we buy foreign currency (including ironically USD), gold, electronics or other tangible assets that hold their value.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I can walk into a bank and get approved to a loan with payments equal to 70% of my income. Regulations are already criminally absent.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Thats been true for a very long time. Before 2008 we had an approval for more than we made per month altogether.

[-] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Ah from here up north this is just watching slow motion Vehicular manslaughter.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

There's no way Trump knows how to drive. This is more like terminal brain cancer. We've got a good month or two left, then we absolutely go insane.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Should I start stuffing my money under my mattress right now?

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

I've been seriously considered converting money into gold. I keep thinking about how my money is just being depreciated every year while it sits in savings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago

If rapid inflation occurs, then no (invest in non-monetary assets). If a bank run occurs then yes. Both could definitely happen if they can't manage to cut trillions of dollars of spending but further cut corporate taxes while deregulating banks and consumer protections. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

load more comments (1 replies)

Maybe move your savings to a good local credit union if that's an option for you.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago

Is that safer than a national bank if we do away with FDIC? Seems like a local credit union would fail before a large corporate bank. But maybe I'm wrong...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Probably should buy durable goods like ammunition.

Check out ammoseek. I'm up 60% and I bought in the height of covid panic.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm a pretty privileged millennial in that I bought my place and I've since paid it off. So I have quite a bit of durable goods already.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Find the most stable government you can and buy bonds

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

There was a 2023 banking crisis?

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 day ago

Some Silicon Valley investor bank failed IIRC, there were a couple of bank runs?

Lot of shit happened last year, I barely remember.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Time to reap the whirlwind

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
394 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19207 readers
1901 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS