this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
167 points (99.4% liked)

collapse of the old society

1171 readers
124 users here now

to discuss news and stuff of the old world dying

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s executive order stripped agencies of their independence by making them directly accountable to a part of the presidency: the office of management and budget (OMB). The OMB is led by Russell Vought, founder of the rightwing Center for Renewing America (CRA) thinktank and one of the primary authors of the Project 2025 plan for an authoritarian takeover of government.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 64 points 1 week ago

path? PATH? we're there

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's time for the media to say the quiet part out loud. Stop warning us about things that have already happened and start helping us change it.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

you assume the media isn't in favor of this

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Who is "the media"? This sounds just as ridiculous to me as when conservatives say it. Reuters? AP? NPR? New Republic? The Atlantic?

Or are you talking only about Fox, OANN, etc?

There's a wide swath of takes in the mainstream, and yes they skew wildly sometimes, but there is categorically no "The Media" monolith conspiring to do anything

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The six companies and their stockholders who own the vast majority of those organizations.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're telling me the sources I mentioned are all owned by the same companies and push the same agenda?

e:

I found this with more info:
https://www.webfx.com/blog/internet/the-6-companies-that-own-almost-all-media-infographic/

not sure of the credibility of the source but it seems correct. I see a lot of television news and entertainment channels split up between several companies.

i'm not saying there's no issues and that these companies don't deserve to be broken up, but railing against "the media" is vague and useless to me

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Took the words out of my mouth.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Not all of them. Choose wisely.

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The media isn’t independent, it’s all just propaganda now.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are independents, they're hanging on for dear life and need our support.

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What media outlets are independent? I would love to broaden my exposure to non oligarchy owned news.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

For starters, under the title link, you'll find The Guardian.

But I also warmly recommend the BBC. They are state-owned, but the UK has kept itself out of their business.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

They don’t want to change it. They don’t want to dismantle the tools of fascism. They just want Democrats to wield them.

[–] Aangeni@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ge, no one saw that coming.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Conservatives certainly didn't. They're stupid enough to think that what Musk and Trump are doing is Freedom™

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They don't think about freedom around me. Most idiots I know are have a fetish for a dictatorship because they think they'll keep on living their redneck dream while getting pretty SS suits when the master takes all the power.

[–] formulaBonk@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Ahh classic, the bigots don't realize that they’re the fuel for the horrific machine and will be disposed as soon as they’re no longer useful

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

"could" ... Lol

[–] Donk@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

No Fucking Shit

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wonder how long it'll take the "masses" to realise that this situation can't be solved peacefully anymore

[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Donald Trump is a tumor. You don't excise tumors with platitudes about community and bipartisanship.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The executive order in question is likely no. 14215, currently disputed in court by the DNC. Among other things, it says:

"(b) "Agency," unless otherwise indicated, means any authority of the United States that is an "agency" under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1), and shall also include the Federal Election Commission.

...and also...

The President and the Attorney General, subject to the President's supervision and control, shall provide authoritative interpretations of law for the executive branch. The President and the Attorney General's opinions on questions of law are controlling on all employees in the conduct of their official duties.

No employee of the executive branch acting in their official capacity may advance an interpretation of the law as the position of the United States that contravenes the President or the Attorney General's opinion on a matter of law, including but not limited to the issuance of regulations, guidance, and positions advanced in litigation, unless authorized to do so by the President or in writing by the Attorney General.

It's easy to foresee that he wants to alter the constitutional order and establish an authoritarian regime.

Some sound advise to people in the US:

  • observe what becomes of the legal challenges to this and other executive orders
  • see what political action you can take within established frameworks
  • get in touch and establish communications with like-minded people

If the situation worsens, you will benefit from secure communications between people, to hold your councils, make smarter decisions and organize action.

Also, some controversial advise:

  • if you're into tech, find a nice hobby involving something like drones, model planes, airships, tethered blimps, kites, rockets, RC cars, boats, subs or even stationary robots - something that is interesting and fits your budget (let's hope you'll use your skills for fun and wholesome things, but life could make corrections)

  • it also benefits to know your way around communications: how to participate in a mesh network, how to establish a radio link to some distance, how to lay single mode bare fiber between 2 points exceptionally fast

[–] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 2 points 1 week ago

I was wondering what new one was out. The subtext of 'little-noticed' seems wildly misleading. Also, I wonder who is into rocketry these days? I haven't seen them in my local hobby shop for at least several years.

[–] ExtraordinaryJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That's the plan.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok, and if he succeeds I will no longer pay taxes. No taxation without representation and whatnot.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

can you keep your employer from deducting it?

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can specify withholding and deductions on your W-2.

I have a feeling a dictatorship will fix little loopholes like that.